Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
COWZ vs EMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to EMB's −0.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWZ and EMB
Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
EMB costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.8 points; COWZ is 1.5 times larger.
| Measure | COWZ | EMB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | −0.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index | J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.5bn | $13.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 95% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and EMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWZ and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.
EMB
EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or EMB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and EMB −0.4%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or EMB?
- EMB is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWZ against EMB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-emb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). COWZ against EMB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-emb
[COWZ against EMB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-emb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.