Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to IUSB's −1.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and IUSB

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and $49.8bn for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
−1.2%
IUSB total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.06%
IUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IUSB costs 0.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.6 points; IUSB is 2.6 times larger.

COWZ vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZIUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%−1.2%
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexBloomberg U.S. Universal Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.06%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.5bn$49.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Dec 30, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 512 weekly returns
COWZ IUSB
Return
Total return edge COWZ +251.9% +20.5%
Annualized edge COWZ +13.6% +1.9%
Price return edge COWZ +188.5% −11.1%
Risk
Volatility edge IUSB 19.6% 5.4%
Max drawdown edge IUSB −36.3% −17.7%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge COWZ 0.62 −0.10
Sortino edge COWZ 0.89 −0.13
Calmar edge COWZ 0.38 0.11
Reading

COWZ returned more: +251.9% to +20.5%. IUSB swung less: 5.4% to 19.6%. IUSB fell less at its worst: −17.7% to −36.3%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: COWZ vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZIUSBEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+251.9%+20.5%COWZPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.6%+1.9%COWZTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+188.5%−11.1%COWZPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.6%5.4%IUSBSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.8%3.9%IUSBLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−36.3%−17.7%IUSBDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.62−0.10COWZReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.89−0.13COWZReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.380.11COWZAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 512 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ IUSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in IUSB
BLK Liquidity Temp Cash Inst #21 4.75%
TREASURY NOTE 0.49%
TREASURY NOTE 0.42%
TREASURY NOTE 0.41%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
TREASURY NOTE 0.37%
TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 0.36%
UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.35%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Pacer iShares
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year +24.4% −1.2%
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.06%
Holdings 100 18338
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.5bn $49.8bn

COWZ and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1F3987CAFD

COWZ and IUSB do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. COWZ follows Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index and IUSB follows Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 COWZ returned +24.4% and IUSB −1.2% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 25.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

COWZ and IUSB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

IUSB

IUSB tracks an index of Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and IUSB −1.2%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or IUSB?
IUSB is cheaper, by 0.43 percentage points a year. That is about $43 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against IUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-iusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.