BGIG vs DFLV: Differences, Returns & Fees
BGIG and DFLV hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and DFLV returned +26.4% over the year. Net assets: $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF, and $6.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF.
DFLV costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.9 points.
| BGIG | DFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.21% |
| Net assets, BGIG as of Jun 30, 2026 and DFLV as of Jul 31, 2026 | $2.2bn | $6.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | +26.4% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 19% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 24.8% |
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BGIG and DFLV hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
19% in common
On the same fields
BGIG and DFLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BGIG
BGIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About DFLV
DFLV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 334 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BGIG or DFLV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BGIG returned +13.5% and DFLV +26.4%.
- Which is cheaper, BGIG or DFLV?
- DFLV is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BGIG against DFLV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bgig-vs-dflv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BGIG against DFLV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bgig-vs-dflv
[BGIG against DFLV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bgig-vs-dflv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.