Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
DFLV vs EAGL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, DFLV returned +28.5% to EAGL's +11.8%; 9% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DFLV and EAGL
Net assets: $6.8bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF, and $4.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF.
Pair scorecard
DFLV costs 0.59 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.7 points.
| Measure | DFLV | EAGL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +28.5% | +11.8% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.80% |
| Net assets, DFLV as of Jul 31, 2026 and EAGL as of Jun 30, 2026 | $6.8bn | $4.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 24.8% | 58.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 5, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 133 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: DFLV against IWD, Dec 16, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; EAGL against VOO, Apr 5, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026.
DFLV returned slightly more: +45.5% to +43.2%. DFLV swung less: 13.1% to 14.7%. EAGL fell less at its worst: −13.5% to −15.1%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | DFLV | EAGL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +45.5% | +43.2% | DFLV (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.8% | +15.1% | DFLV (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +39.5% | +42.0% | EAGL (slight) | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 13.1% | 14.7% | DFLV | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 9.7% | 9.7% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −15.1% | −13.5% | EAGL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 101.8% | 76.5% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 101.8% | 86.2% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.04 | 0.84 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.94 | 0.69 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.86 | 0.74 | DFLV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.17 | 1.12 | DFLV (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.115 | 0.129 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 1.04 | 1.11 | EAGL (slight) | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IWD | VOO | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −0.5% a year | 0.0% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −0.28 | 0.00 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −4.0% to +3.0% | −10.2% to +10.2% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.02 | −0.25 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 3.5% | 8.5% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 133 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DFLV and EAGL hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
9% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
DFLV and EAGL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFLV and EAGL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 9% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 DFLV returned +28.5% and EAGL +11.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 16.7 points.
- Number of holdings. DFLV holds 334 positions and EAGL holds 27.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +28.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
DFLV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 334 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%.
EAGL
EAGL is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +11.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.80% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 71% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 58.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFLV or EAGL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFLV returned +28.5% and EAGL +11.8%.
- Which is cheaper, DFLV or EAGL?
- DFLV is cheaper, by 0.59 percentage points a year. That is about $59 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DFLV against EAGL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dflv-vs-eagl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). DFLV against EAGL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dflv-vs-eagl
[DFLV against EAGL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dflv-vs-eagl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.