BGIG vs FDL: Differences, Returns & Fees

BGIG and FDL hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and FDL returned +20.6% over the year. Net assets: $2.2bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF, and $7.7bn on Oct 9, 2026 for First Trust Morningstar ETF.

FDL costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.1 points; FDL is 3.4 times larger.

BGIG vs FDL: Differences, Returns & Fees
BGIGFDL
Expense ratio0.45%0.43%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$2.2bn$7.3bn
Total return, 1 year+13.5%+20.6%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMorningstar Dividend Leaders Index
Holdings in common8%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%50.4%
Below its high3.8%, high on Aug 13, 20265.9%, high on Aug 24, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+13.5%
BGIG total return, 1 year
+20.6%
FDL total return, 1 year
0.45%
BGIG expense ratio
0.43%
FDL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BGIG and FDL hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

8% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BGIG FDL
Chevron Corp 2.13% 9.08%
Mondelez International Inc 1.65% 1.69%
Philip Morris International In 1.48% 6.77%
Kinder Morgan Inc 0.96% 1.63%
WEC Energy Group Inc 1.86% 0.81%
Accenture PLC 0.61% 3.00%
Only in BGIG
Broadcom Inc 4.87%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 4.84%
Eli Lilly & Co 4.44%
PNC Financial Services Group I 4.11%
TSMC 4.05%
Johnson & Johnson 4.03%
AbbVie Inc 3.51%
Microsoft Corp 3.39%
Only in FDL
Verizon Communications Inc. 6.56%
Pfizer Inc. 6.55%
PepsiCo, Inc. 4.97%
Altria Group, Inc. 4.95%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 3.06%
United Parcel Service, Inc. (Class B) 3.04%
Comcast Corporation (Class A) 2.45%
Medtronic Plc 2.33%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

BGIG
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF
FDL
First Trust Morningstar ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +13.5% +20.6%
Expense ratio 0.45% 0.43%
Already in the S&P 500 94.5% 93.3%
Holdings 50 100
Net assets, BGIG as of Jun 30, 2026 and FDL as of Oct 9, 2026 $2.2bn $7.7bn

BGIG and FDL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BGIG

BGIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About FDL

FDL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.43% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 50.4%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BGIG or FDL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BGIG returned +13.5% and FDL +20.6%.
Which is cheaper, BGIG or FDL?
FDL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do BGIG and FDL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of BGIG and 93% of FDL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BGIG against FDL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bgig-vs-fdl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.