Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BAFE vs CGGR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BAFE returned +10.6% to CGGR's +2.6%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BAFE and CGGR
Net assets: $1.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF, and $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGGR costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.0 points.
| Measure | BAFE | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.6% | +2.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.39% |
| Net assets, BAFE as of Jun 30, 2026 and CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.7bn | $25.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.2% | 39.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BAFE and CGGR hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
30% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BAFE and CGGR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BAFE and CGGR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 30% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BAFE returned +10.6% and CGGR +2.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.0 points.
- Cost. BAFE charges 0.54% of assets a year and CGGR 0.39%, a gap of 0.15 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BAFE
BAFE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +10.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BAFE or CGGR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BAFE returned +10.6% and CGGR +2.6%.
- Which is cheaper, BAFE or CGGR?
- CGGR is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BAFE against CGGR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-cggr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BAFE against CGGR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-cggr
[BAFE against CGGR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-cggr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.