Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs QVML: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to QVML's +14.8%; 35% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and QVML
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $1.7bn for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF.
Pair scorecard
QVML costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.2 points; CGGR is 15.2 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | QVML |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +14.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.11% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $1.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 35% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 41.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and QVML hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
35% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and QVML on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and QVML are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and QVML follows S&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index.
- Holdings in common. 35% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and QVML +14.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
QVML
QVML tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.11% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 438 positions, with the top ten at 41.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or QVML?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and QVML +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or QVML?
- QVML is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against QVML, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-qvml
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against QVML. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-qvml
[CGGR against QVML (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-qvml)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.