Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs QUS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to QUS's +14.8%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and QUS
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $1.6bn for State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF.
Pair scorecard
QUS costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.2 points; CGGR is 16.2 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | QUS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +14.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $1.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 22.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and QUS hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
30% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and QUS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and QUS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and QUS follows MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index.
- Holdings in common. 30% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and QUS +14.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 12.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
QUS
QUS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 514 positions, with the top ten at 22.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or QUS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and QUS +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or QUS?
- QUS is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against QUS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-qus
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against QUS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-qus
[CGGR against QUS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-qus)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.