Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AGG vs EZU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AGG returned −1.4% to EZU's +7.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AGG and EZU

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $139.4bn for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and $9.2bn for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
AGG total return, 1 year
+7.1%
EZU total return, 1 year
0.03%
AGG expense ratio
0.50%
EZU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AGG costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points; AGG is 15.2 times larger.

AGG vs EZU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAGGEZU
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+7.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 4, 20208.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond IndexMSCI EMU Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.50%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$139.4bn$9.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, AGG and EZU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AGG EZU
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AGG
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 3.02%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE (OLD) 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.40%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.39%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
Only in EZU
ASML HOLDING 8.79%
SAP 3.33%
SIEMENS N AG 2.97%
ALLIANZ 2.55%
BANCO SANTANDER 2.48%
TOTALENERGIES 2.48%
IBERDROLA 2.10%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 2.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the MSCI Eurozone
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +7.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.3% (SCHZ) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SCHZ −7.2 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.50%
Holdings 13469 216
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $139.4bn $9.2bn

AGG and EZU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

AGG and EZU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AGG

AGG tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.3% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

EZU

EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or EZU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned −1.4% and EZU +7.1%.
Which is cheaper, AGG or EZU?
AGG is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AGG against EZU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/agg-vs-ezu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.