Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BND vs EZU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BND returned −1.3% to EZU's +7.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BND and EZU

Net assets: $161.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, and $9.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF.

At a glance
−1.3%
BND total return, 1 year
+7.1%
EZU total return, 1 year
0.03%
BND expense ratio
0.50%
EZU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BND costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.4 points; BND is 17.2 times larger.

BND vs EZU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDEZU
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+7.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.5%, high on Aug 6, 20208.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksBloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted IndexMSCI EMU Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.03%0.50%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$161.4bn$9.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 20, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,018 weekly returns
BND EZU
Return
Total return edge EZU +75.5% +97.6%
Annualized edge EZU +2.9% +3.5%
Price return edge EZU −5.4% +11.8%
Risk
Volatility edge BND 5.0% 23.5%
Max drawdown edge BND −18.4% −64.2%
Downside capture 95.6% 107.7%
Beta 0.91 1.12
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge BND 0.29 0.20
Sortino edge BND 0.39 0.28
Treynor 0.016 0.046
Calmar edge BND 0.16 0.06
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.2% a year −0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.59 −0.24
Information ratio 0.03 0.02
Tracking error 1.3% 8.6%

Each against its own benchmark: BND against AGG, Apr 20, 2007 to Oct 23, 2026; EZU against ACWX, Apr 11, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

EZU returned more: +97.6% to +75.5%. BND swung less: 5.0% to 23.5%. BND fell less at its worst: −18.4% to −64.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BND vs EZU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBNDEZUEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+75.5%+97.6%EZUPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.9%+3.5%EZUTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−5.4%+11.8%EZUPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility5.0%23.5%BNDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.7%17.1%BNDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.4%−64.2%BNDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture95.8%119.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.6%107.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.911.12Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.940.88Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.290.20BNDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.390.28BNDReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0160.046Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.160.06BNDAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGACWXThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.2% a year−0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.59−0.24Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.4% to +0.7%−4.2% to +3.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.030.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.3%8.6%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,018 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BND and EZU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BND EZU
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BND
MKTLIQ 0.92%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.40%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.39%
Only in EZU
ASML HOLDING 8.79%
SAP 3.33%
SIEMENS N AG 2.97%
ALLIANZ 2.55%
BANCO SANTANDER 2.48%
TOTALENERGIES 2.48%
IBERDROLA 2.10%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 2.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US aggregate bonds Tracks the MSCI Eurozone
Total return, 1 year −1.3% +7.1%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark +0.1 pts vs AGG −7.2 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.03% 0.50%
Holdings 16301 216
Net assets, BND as of Sep 30, 2026 and EZU as of Oct 27, 2026 $161.4bn $9.2bn

BND and EZU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-F31F206FCF

BND and EZU do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. BND follows Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index and EZU follows MSCI EMU Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BND returned −1.3% and EZU +7.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EZU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BND

BND tracks an index of US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, measured by the closely related Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

EZU

EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or EZU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −1.3% and EZU +7.1%.
Which is cheaper, BND or EZU?
BND is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BND against EZU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bnd-vs-ezu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.