Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Alternative ETFs

AHLT vs KMLM: Correlation to the S&P 500

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KMLM moved less with the S&P 500 than AHLT: correlation −0.12 against +0.47.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AHLT and KMLM

Net assets: $131m on Jul 31, 2026 for AHL Trend ETF, and $586m on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF.

At a glance
+0.47
AHLT correlation with the S&P 500
−0.12
KMLM correlation with the S&P 500
81.7%
AHLT down-week capture
−16.3%
KMLM down-week capture
AHLT Fell 82% as much as the S&P 500
Fell 82% as much as the S&P 500AHLT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, AHLT −0.88%.SPY−1.07%AHLT−0.88%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Fell 82% as much as the S&P 500AHLT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, AHLT −0.88%.SPY−1.07%AHLT−0.88%Average week when SPY fell

AHLT in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, AHLT −0.88%.

KMLM Rose when the S&P 500 fell
Rose when the S&P 500 fellKMLM in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, KMLM +0.18%.SPY−1.07%KMLM+0.18%Average week when SPY fell: 26 of 52, year to Nov 4, 2026Rose when the S&P 500 fellKMLM in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, KMLM +0.18%.SPY−1.07%KMLM+0.18%Average week when SPY fell

KMLM in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, KMLM +0.18%.

Pair scorecard

KMLM costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points.

AHLT vs KMLM: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureAHLTKMLM
Return
Total return, 1 year+19.3%+16.5%
Against its benchmark
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.96%0.90%
Net assets, AHLT as of Jul 31, 2026 and KMLM as of Nov 4, 2026$131m$586m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Beta to the S&P 500+0.58: about 0.58% for each 1%−0.12: about 0.12% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.88%rose 0.18%
ETFIQ Stock Diversification Score · KMLM scores higher How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?
IQ Alternatives Score41.2AHLT94.2KMLM

How much it diversifies a stock portfolio, ranked against 17 systematic trend alternatives ETFs with a full year. 100 is best. How it is computed

2.9, the lowest in this set 94.2, the highest

One year of weekly moves against the S&P 500, within one strategy; it ignores what the fund returned. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Sep 8, 2023 to Oct 30, 2026 · 164 weekly returns
AHLT KMLM
Return
Total return edge AHLT +23.1% +1.1%
Annualized edge AHLT +6.8% +0.3%
Price return edge AHLT +16.7% −4.5%
Risk
Volatility edge KMLM 15.3% 11.3%
Max drawdown edge AHLT −18.6% −22.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge AHLT 0.21 −0.31
Sortino edge AHLT 0.28 −0.40
Calmar edge AHLT 0.37 0.02
Reading

From Sep 2023 to Oct 2026, AHLT returned more: +23.1% to +1.1%. KMLM swung less: 11.3% to 15.3%. AHLT fell less at its worst: −18.6% to −22.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: AHLT vs KMLM: Correlation to the S&P 500
MeasureAHLTKMLMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+23.1%+1.1%AHLTPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+6.8%+0.3%AHLTTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+16.7%−4.5%AHLTPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility15.3%11.3%KMLMSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.6%8.8%KMLMLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.6%−22.1%AHLTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.21−0.31AHLTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.28−0.40AHLTReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.370.02AHLTAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 164 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: AHLT vs KMLM: Correlation to the S&P 500
Total return
WindowAHLTKMLM
3 months+2.3%+3.0%
6 months+0.3%+0.6%
1 year+19.3%+16.5%
3 years+22.1%−0.7%
Since launchNot the same days: AHLT Aug 2023 · KMLM Dec 2020+22.2%+49.0%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

AHLT AHL Trend ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises KMLM KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF · Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
Strategy Managed futures Managed futures
Correlation with the S&P 500 +0.47 −0.12
Beta to the S&P 500 +0.58 −0.12
Down-week capture 81.7% −16.3%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell −0.88% +0.18%
The S&P 500 in those weeks −1.07% −1.07%
Total return, same 52 weeks +18.3% +16.6%
Against T-bills, percentage points +14.7 pts +12.9 pts
Expense ratio 0.96% 0.90%
First traded Aug 31, 2023 Dec 2, 2020
Net assets, AHLT as of Jul 31, 2026 and KMLM as of Nov 4, 2026 $131m $586m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

One strategy, two funds

AHLT and KMLM both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, AHLT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.47 with the S&P 500 and KMLM’s −0.12. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, AHLT averaged −0.88% and KMLM +0.18%. Over the same weeks, AHLT finished 14.7 percentage points ahead of cash and KMLM finished 12.9 points ahead of cash.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

KMLM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AHLT

AHLT is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.47 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.58, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.58% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks AHLT fell 0.88% on average, a down-week capture of 81.7%. Over the same 52 weeks AHLT returned +18.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 14.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

KMLM

KMLM is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.12 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.12, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.12% the other way. In the same weeks KMLM rose 0.18% on average, a down-week capture of −16.3%. Over the same 52 weeks KMLM returned +16.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, AHLT or KMLM?
Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, AHLT’s weekly returns had a correlation of +0.47 with the S&P 500 and KMLM’s −0.12, so KMLM moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, AHLT or KMLM?
In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, AHLT averaged −0.88% and KMLM +0.18%, so KMLM returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, AHLT or KMLM?
Over the same weeks, AHLT finished 14.7 percentage points ahead of cash and KMLM finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, AHLT or KMLM?
AHLT charges 0.96% a year and KMLM charges 0.90%, so KMLM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AHLT against KMLM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/ahlt-vs-kmlm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.