Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
KMLM vs WTMF: Correlation to the S&P 500
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KMLM moved less with the S&P 500 than WTMF: correlation −0.12 against +0.62.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about KMLM and WTMF
Net assets: $586m on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF, and $261m on Aug 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund.
KMLM in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, KMLM +0.18%.
WTMF in the 26 weeks SPY fell, year to Nov 4, 2026: SPY averaged −1.07%, WTMF −0.37%.
Pair scorecard
WTMF costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.8 points.
| Measure | KMLM | WTMF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +16.5% | +12.7% |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.90% | 0.66% |
| Net assets, KMLM as of Nov 4, 2026 and WTMF as of Aug 31, 2026 | $586m | $261m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Risk | ||
| Beta to the S&P 500 | −0.12: about 0.12% for each 1% | +0.38: about 0.38% for each 1% |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | rose 0.18% | fell 0.37% |
How much it diversifies a stock portfolio, ranked against 17 systematic trend alternatives ETFs with a full year. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year of weekly moves against the S&P 500, within one strategy; it ignores what the fund returned. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Dec 11, 2020 to Oct 30, 2026 · 307 weekly returnsFrom Dec 2020 to Oct 2026, WTMF returned slightly more: +60.0% to +55.0%. WTMF swung less: 7.5% to 13.4%. WTMF fell less at its worst: −10.7% to −27.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | KMLM | WTMF | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +55.0% | +60.0% | WTMF (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +7.7% | +8.3% | WTMF (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +21.2% | +10.4% | KMLM | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 13.4% | 7.5% | WTMF | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 9.2% | 4.9% | WTMF | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −27.6% | −10.7% | WTMF | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.37 | 0.65 | WTMF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.54 | 0.99 | WTMF | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.28 | 0.78 | WTMF | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 307 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Window by window
| Total return | ||
|---|---|---|
| Window | KMLM | WTMF |
| 3 months | +3.0% | +1.6% |
| 6 months | +0.6% | +3.0% |
| 1 year | +16.5% | +12.7% |
| 3 years | −0.7% | +33.3% |
| Since launchNot the same days: KMLM Dec 2020 · WTMF Jan 2011 | +49.0% | +21.0% |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
One strategy, two funds
KMLM and WTMF both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, KMLM’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.12 with the S&P 500 and WTMF’s +0.62. In the 26 weeks the index fell, by 1.07% a week on average, KMLM averaged +0.18% and WTMF −0.37%. Over the same weeks, KMLM finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash and WTMF finished 8.1 points ahead of cash.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
KMLM
KMLM is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.12 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.12, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.12% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks KMLM rose 0.18% on average, a down-week capture of −16.3%. Over the same 52 weeks KMLM returned +16.6% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 12.9 percentage points ahead of cash.
WTMF
WTMF is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.62 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.38, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.38% the same way. In the same weeks WTMF fell 0.37% on average, a down-week capture of 34.4%. Over the same 52 weeks WTMF returned +11.8% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 8.1 percentage points ahead of cash.
Questions people ask
- Which moved less with the S&P 500, KMLM or WTMF?
- Over the 52 weeks to Nov 4, 2026, KMLM’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.12 with the S&P 500 and WTMF’s +0.62, so KMLM moved less with the index.
- Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, KMLM or WTMF?
- In the 26 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.07% a week on average, KMLM averaged +0.18% and WTMF −0.37%, so KMLM returned more in those weeks.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KMLM against WTMF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/kmlm-vs-wtmf
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). KMLM against WTMF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/kmlm-vs-wtmf
[KMLM against WTMF (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/kmlm-vs-wtmf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.