Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CTA vs KMLM: which moved less with stocks?

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CTA moved less with the S&P 500 than KMLM: correlation −0.26 against −0.24.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF.

−0.26CTA correlation with the S&P 500
−0.24KMLM correlation with the S&P 500
−78.5%CTA down-week capture
−60.3%KMLM down-week capture

ETFIQ Diversifier Score: CTA scores higher

How much does it diversify a stock portfolio?

CTA 95.3KMLM 93.74.8, the lowest in this set98.0, the highest

A percentile among the 63 alternatives ETFs with a full year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All alternatives ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CTARose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%CTA+0.97%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%CTA+0.97%Average week when SPY fell
KMLMRose when the S&P 500 fell
SPY−1.24%KMLM+0.75%Average week when SPY fell: 22 of 52, year to Sep 18, 2026SPY−1.24%KMLM+0.75%Average week when SPY fell

One strategy, two funds

CTA and KMLM both run a managed futures strategy. Over the same 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CTA’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.26 with the S&P 500 and KMLM’s −0.24. In the 22 weeks the index fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CTA averaged +0.97% and KMLM +0.75%. Over the same weeks, CTA finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash and KMLM finished 16.1 points ahead of cash.

Performance, window by window

CTA and KMLM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500
CTAKMLMCTAKMLM
3 months+11.3%+10.8%+9.0 pts+8.5 pts
6 months+1.2%+10.2%−16.9 pts−7.8 pts
1 year+13.8%+19.6%−2.8 pts+3.1 pts
3 years+31.9%+0.6%−46.5 pts−77.8 pts
Since launch+52.5%+57.1%−42.5 pts−68.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CTA and KMLM on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
KMLM
KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF
Managed futures fund: follows price trends in futures on stocks, bonds, currencies and commodities, and can bet on falls as well as rises
IssuerSimplifyKraneShares
StrategyManaged futuresManaged futures
Correlation with the S&P 500−0.26−0.24
Beta to the S&P 500−0.47−0.22
Down-week capture−78.5%−60.3%
Average week when the S&P 500 fell+0.97%+0.75%
The S&P 500 in those weeks−1.24%−1.24%
Total return, same 52 weeks+13.7%+19.7%
Against T-bills, percentage points+10.1 pts+16.1 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.90%
ListedMar 8, 2022Dec 2, 2020
Net assets$1.5bn$536m

CTA in plain words

CTA is a managed futures fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.26 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.47, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.47% the other way. The S&P 500 fell in 22 of those 52 weeks, by 1.24% on average. In the same weeks CTA rose 0.97% on average, a down-week capture of −78.5%. Over the same 52 weeks CTA returned +13.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

KMLM in plain words

KMLM is a managed futures fund. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of −0.24 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of −0.22, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.22% the other way. In the same weeks KMLM rose 0.75% on average, a down-week capture of −60.3%. Over the same 52 weeks KMLM returned +19.7% and a Treasury bill fund +3.6%, so it finished 16.1 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Which moved less with the S&P 500, CTA or KMLM?
Over the 52 weeks to Sep 18, 2026, CTA’s weekly returns had a correlation of −0.26 with the S&P 500 and KMLM’s −0.24, so CTA moved less with the index.
Which did better when the S&P 500 fell, CTA or KMLM?
In the 22 weeks the S&P 500 fell, by 1.24% a week on average, CTA averaged +0.97% and KMLM +0.75%, so CTA returned more in those weeks.
Which earned more than cash, CTA or KMLM?
Over the same weeks, CTA finished 10.1 percentage points ahead of cash and KMLM finished 16.1 percentage points ahead of cash. Cash here is BIL, a fund of Treasury bills.
Which is cheaper, CTA or KMLM?
CTA charges 0.75% a year and KMLM charges 0.90%, so CTA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTA against KMLM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against KMLM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/alternatives/cta-vs-kmlm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources