ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsResearch
My portfolioWeekly note

EFZ ProShares Short MSCI EAFE

Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of developed markets outside the US (EFA)ProShares0.95% fee$10mSince Jan 4, 2010Fund page at the issuer ↗SEC filings ↗Every ProShares fund ETFIQ covers
Share on XDownload as PDFCompareAdd to portfolioAlerts

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: EFZ returned −0.1% where its own daily promise gave −1.3%, 1.1 points over.

+0.8%
What EFA did
−1.3%
What −1 times a day gives
−0.1%
What the fund returned
+1.1 pts
The fund itself added
What it aimed at, and what it did
On its stated multipleEFZ returned +3.5% while −1 times EFA's move would have been +3.3%EFA −3.3% ×−1 implies+3.3%EFZ returned+3.5%On its stated multipleEFZ returned +3.5% while −1 times EFA's move would have been +3.3%EFA −3.3% ×−1 implies+3.3%EFZ returned+3.5%

Over the 1 month to Sep 30, 2026, EFZ returned +3.5%, where −1 times that move implies +3.3%. The difference is +0.2 pts.

0.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleEFZ returned −0.1% while −1 times EFA's move would have been −0.8%EFA +0.8% ×−1 implies−0.8%EFZ returned−0.1%0.7 pts ahead of its stated multipleEFZ returned −0.1% while −1 times EFA's move would have been −0.8%EFA +0.8% ×−1 implies−0.8%EFZ returned−0.1%

Over the 3 months to Sep 30, 2026, EFZ returned −0.1%, where −1 times that move implies −0.8%. The difference is +0.7 pts.

1.6 pts ahead of its stated multipleEFZ returned −5.4% while −1 times EFA's move would have been −7.0%EFA +7.0% ×−1 implies−7.0%EFZ returned−5.4%1.6 pts ahead of its stated multipleEFZ returned −5.4% while −1 times EFA's move would have been −7.0%EFA +7.0% ×−1 implies−7.0%EFZ returned−5.4%

Over the 6 months to Sep 30, 2026, EFZ returned −5.4%, where −1 times that move implies −7.0%. The difference is +1.6 pts.

4.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleEFZ returned −10.6% while −1 times EFA's move would have been −15.1%EFA +15.1% ×−1 implies−15.1%EFZ returned−10.6%4.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleEFZ returned −10.6% while −1 times EFA's move would have been −15.1%EFA +15.1% ×−1 implies−15.1%EFZ returned−10.6%

Over the 1 year to Sep 30, 2026, EFZ returned −10.6%, where −1 times that move implies −15.1%. The difference is +4.5 pts.

34.9 pts ahead of its stated multipleEFZ returned −30.8% while −1 times EFA's move would have been −65.7%EFA +65.7% ×−1 implies−65.7%EFZ returned−30.8%34.9 pts ahead of its stated multipleEFZ returned −30.8% while −1 times EFA's move would have been −65.7%EFA +65.7% ×−1 implies−65.7%EFZ returned−30.8%

Over the 3 years to Sep 30, 2026, EFZ returned −30.8%, where −1 times that move implies −65.7%. The difference is +34.9 pts.

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score
30.088th of 125

EFZ finished 1.1 points ahead of what -1 times EFA’s daily move would have given, compounded through the same days.

points against its own daily promise, compounded+1.1 pts · 30th pct
All 125 ranked by this score →How it is computed →

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

Points against its own daily promise, compounded
QBTZ −24.9 ptsRKLZ −21.5 ptsIONZ −14.0 ptsRGTZ −10.3 ptsASTN −9.3 ptsSPCQ −6.0 ptsSMZ −5.6 ptsMUZ −3.1 ptsAPLZ −2.0 ptsSMCZ −1.1 ptsCONI −0.9 ptsSVIX −0.9 ptsSMST −0.8 ptsBMNZ −0.7 ptsSNK −0.5 ptsCORD −0.3 ptsCRCD −0.3 ptsSSPC −0.2 ptsIREZ −0.1 ptsMSTZ −0.1 ptsPLTZ −0.1 ptsSTSM −0.1 ptsNBIZ 0.0 ptsGDXD +0.1 ptsBEZ +0.2 ptsNVDQ +0.2 ptsDAMD +0.3 ptsETHD +0.3 ptsSNDQ +0.3 ptsTSLZ +0.3 ptsBTCZ +0.5 ptsCBRZ +0.5 ptsLITZ +0.5 ptsSBIT +0.8 ptsMSFD +1.0 ptsSETH +1.0 ptsSPCG +1.1 ptsBITI +1.2 ptsDULL +1.2 ptsGGLS +1.2 ptsMETD +1.2 ptsPALD +1.2 ptsAMZD +1.3 ptsBZQ +1.3 ptsYXI +1.3 ptsAAPD +1.4 ptsAMZO +1.4 ptsCSCS +1.4 ptsEUM +1.4 ptsJDST +1.4 ptsNVD +1.4 ptsNVDS +1.4 ptsORCS +1.4 ptsQCMD +1.4 ptsREK +1.4 ptsEFU +1.5 ptsNFXS +1.5 ptsSCO +1.5 ptsTSDD +1.5 ptsTSMZ +1.5 ptsDOG +1.6 ptsDRIP +1.6 ptsEWV +1.6 ptsMUD +1.6 ptsMYY +1.6 ptsNVDD +1.6 ptsRWM +1.6 ptsSBB +1.6 ptsSKRE +1.6 ptsDUG +1.7 ptsDUST +1.7 ptsPSQ +1.7 ptsSEF +1.7 ptsSH +1.7 ptsSPDN +1.7 ptsTBX +1.7 ptsAVS +1.8 ptsEPV +1.8 ptsERY +1.8 ptsTBF +1.8 ptsEEV +1.9 ptsRXD +2.0 ptsREW +2.1 ptsTSLS +2.1 ptsSMN +2.2 ptsSZK +2.2 ptsPST +2.3 ptsTSLQ +2.4 ptsWEBS +2.4 ptsFNGD +2.5 ptsSDS +2.5 ptsSKF +2.5 ptsSRS +2.5 ptsDXD +2.6 ptsQID +2.6 ptsSDP +2.6 ptsTBT +2.7 ptsFXP +2.8 ptsSIJ +2.8 ptsTECS +2.8 ptsMZZ +2.9 ptsEDZ +3.0 ptsGLL +3.0 ptsLABD +3.0 ptsSCC +3.0 ptsSDD +3.0 ptsTWM +3.0 ptsHIBS +3.2 ptsYANG +3.2 ptsSPXS +3.4 ptsSPXU +3.4 ptsSQQQ +3.4 ptsDRV +3.5 ptsSOXS +3.7 ptsFAZ +4.0 ptsSDOW +4.0 ptsTTT +4.0 ptsZSL +4.1 ptsTZA +4.2 ptsSMDD +4.3 ptsSRTY +4.4 ptsTMV +4.6 ptsTYO +4.7 ptsBIS +5.1 ptsEFZ +1.1 ptsEFZ +1.1 pts−24.9 pts+5.1 pts
−24.9 pts to +5.1 pts across 125

That is the share of the 125 inverse ETFs over three months sitting at or below EFZ.

A position in this set, not a rating: it moves when the set moves, and it is not a figure to average against another desk's.

WindowFundEFA-1x the moveDifferenceEFA moved about
1M Aug 31 – Sep 30, 2026+3.5%−3.3%+3.3%+0.2 pts13%
3M Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026−0.1%+0.8%−0.8%+0.7 pts13%
6M Apr 1 – Sep 30, 2026−5.4%+7.0%−7.0%+1.6 pts16%
1Y Sep 30, 2025 – Sep 30, 2026−10.6%+15.1%−15.1%+4.5 pts16%
3Y Sep 29, 2023 – Sep 30, 2026−30.8%+65.7%−65.7%+34.9 pts15%
Since launch Jan 4, 2010 – Sep 30, 2026−75.6%+200.6%not meaningful over this windownot meaningful over this window18%

EFZ over each window to Sep 30, 2026. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation. Source: ETFIQ.

In plain words

Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times EFA's 0.8% implies −0.8%, which makes EFZ look 0.7 points over. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EFZ aims to return -1 times EFA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. EFA moved at 13% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
Sets out to return-1 times the daily move of EFA, reset daily
Multiple a holder actually got over the window (ETFIQ)EFA moved +0.8% over this window, too little to read a multiple from
UnderlyingEFA
Segmentsector or country, sector
Net assets (issuer page, as of Sep 30, 2026)$10m
Expense ratio (485BPOS XBRL, Sep 25, 2026)0.95%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010
Underlying volatility over the window (ETFIQ)13% annualized
EFZ (ProShares Short MSCI EAFE), leveraged ETFs fields as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Returns are ETFIQ calculations from Tiingo end-of-day prices, distributions reinvested, measured against the underlying over exactly the same days. How these figures are computed

Questions people ask about EFZ

Did EFZ return -1 times EFA?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, EFA moved +0.8% and EFZ returned −0.1%. −1 times that move is −0.8%, so the fund came out 0.7 points ahead of it.
Why does EFZ not return -1 times over a year?
Because it resets daily. EFZ aims at -1 times each day's move, and daily results compound. Over a run where the underlying falls and comes back, compounding a levered daily return leaves a holder behind what -1 times the period move would suggest; over a steady run in one direction it can leave them ahead. The longer the holding, and the more the underlying moves about, the further apart the two figures get.
Sources and dates
Prices, EFZ and EFATiingo end-of-day prices ↗
Fee, 0.95%SEC 485BPOS XBRL · Sep 25, 2026
Net assets, $10mIssuer page · Sep 30, 2026
IssuerProShares page for EFZ ↗
All fund filingsFund filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
SourceSEC investment company series and class file, which lists every registered fund ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

How these figures are computed →Standards and sources →Open data →
Cite this page

ETFIQ, EFZ, leveraged ETFs, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/funds/efz

Open EFZ live on ETFIQ

The label bar for EFZ, redrawn every trading night. Free to use with the credit link.

Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

Stated multiple
What the fund sets out to return against its underlying, each day. A fund at 2x aims to return twice the underlying’s daily move, and an inverse fund at -2x aims to return twice it in the opposite direction.
Daily reset
The fund starts each day aiming at the multiple again, from wherever it now stands. It is the mechanism that makes these funds behave as they do, and the reason the stated multiple applies to a day rather than to a holding period.
Compounding
Daily results multiply together rather than adding up. Two days of the multiple is not twice the multiple, and over a run of days the difference between the two grows with how far the underlying moves about.
Decay
What compounding costs a holder when the underlying falls and rises back to where it started. The underlying is level and the fund is down; the more violently it moved, the further down.
Difference against the stated multiple
The fund’s return minus the stated multiple times the underlying’s return, in percentage points. The one figure that says whether a holder got what the fund’s own multiple describes.
Every term used here, defined in full on the leveraged ETFs vocabulary page. →
ProShares: every fund ETFIQ covers→