RCTR vs URAN: which is really different?

RCTR and URAN hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and RCTR returned −2.0% over the year. First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF and Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF.

27.5%
RCTR in the S&P 500
24.7%
URAN in the S&P 500
−2.0%
RCTR total return, 1 year
−22.3%
URAN total return, 1 year
RCTR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202673% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
73% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of RCTR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 73% is outside the index28%73%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 47% of the fund · 50 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 5% in73% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of RCTR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 73% is outside the index28%73%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 47% of the fund

28% of RCTR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 73% is outside the index

URAN · 1 year to Sep 30, 202675% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
75% of its weight is outside the S&P 50025% of URAN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index25%75%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 41% of the fund · 42 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 14% in75% of its weight is outside the S&P 50025% of URAN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index25%75%inoutside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 41% of the fund

25% of URAN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · URAN scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RCTR and URAN hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

28% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding RCTR URAN
Constellation Energy Corporation 5.03% 9.88%
Duke Energy Corporation 4.17% 4.04%
Cameco Corp. 4.18% 3.19%
NexGen Energy Ltd. 2.03% 3.23%
BWX Technologies, Inc. 3.39% 1.99%
Talen Energy Corporation 4.06% 1.93%
Oklo Inc. (Class A) 1.92% 3.45%
Uranium Energy Corp. 1.61% 2.95%
Mirion Technologies, Inc. 1.18% 2.29%
Paladin Energy Ltd 1.03% 2.65%
Energy Fuels Inc. 0.95% 2.40%
Centrus Energy Corp. (Class A) 0.90% 2.20%
Only in RCTR
Hitachi, Ltd. 5.75%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd. 5.08%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. 4.91%
BHP Group Limited 4.77%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc 4.57%
Vistra Corp. 4.34%
Entergy Corporation 4.08%
GE Vernova Inc. 4.04%
Only in URAN
American Electric Power Co Inc 4.20%
Public Service Enterprise Grou 3.81%
CNNP 3.20%
CGN Power Co Ltd 2.78%
PG&E Corp 2.77%
IsoEnergy Ltd 2.77%
Lightbridge Corp 2.74%
Deep Yellow Ltd 2.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

28% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowRCTRURANRCTRURANRCTRURAN
3 months−3.6%−8.6%−6.1 pts−11.1 pts−5.7 pts−10.7 pts
6 months−10.6%−21.3%−27.6 pts−38.3 pts−37.5 pts−48.2 pts
1 year−2.0%−22.3%−17.7 pts−38.0 pts−25.8 pts−46.0 pts
Since launch
RCTR Jul 2025 · URAN Sep 2024
+6.0%+30.1%−16.3 pts−6.4 pts−25.7 pts−23.8 pts

RCTR and URAN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · Holds 50 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 28% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
URAN
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF · Holds 42 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 25% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer First Trust Themes
Theme Nuclear and uranium Nuclear and uranium
In the S&P 500 27.5% 24.7%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.9% 99.5%
In the Nasdaq-100 5.0% 14.1%
Holdings 50 42
Top ten, share of the fund 46.9% 41.2%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.35%
Fee for the differing part 0.71% 0.35%
Total return, 1 year −2.0% −22.3%
vs the S&P 500 −17.7 pts −38.0 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −25.8 pts −46.0 pts
Below its high −17.8% −36.3%
Net assets $29m $25m

RCTR and URAN on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

RCTR in plain words

By weight, 28% of RCTR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 50 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 17.7 pts. It sits 17.8% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

URAN in plain words

By weight, 25% of URAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 42 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −22.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 38.0 pts. It sits 36.3% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do RCTR and URAN hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, RCTR or URAN?
RCTR has 28% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URAN has 25%, so URAN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, RCTR or URAN?
RCTR charges 0.70% a year and URAN charges 0.35%, so URAN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, RCTR against URAN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rctr-vs-uran

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.