RCTR vs SMRF: which is really different?

RCTR and SMRF hold 29% of their weight in the same names. First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF.

27.5%
RCTR in the S&P 500
27.8%
SMRF in the S&P 500
−2.0%
RCTR total return, 1 year
−11.7%
SMRF total return, since launch
RCTR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202673% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
73% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of RCTR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 73% is outside the index28%73%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 47% of the fund · 50 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 5% in73% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of RCTR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 73% is outside the index28%73%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 47% of the fund

28% of RCTR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 73% is outside the index

SMRF · 6 months to Sep 30, 202672% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
72% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of SMRF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index28%72%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 93% · top ten 40% of the fund · 72 holdings filed May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 14% in72% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of SMRF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index28%72%inoutside the S&P 500active share 93% · top ten 40% of the fund

28% of SMRF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · RCTR scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RCTR and SMRF hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

29% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding RCTR SMRF
Cameco Corp. 4.18% 4.30%
GE Vernova Inc. 4.04% 3.82%
BWX Technologies, Inc. 3.39% 4.23%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc 4.57% 2.16%
NexGen Energy Ltd. 2.03% 4.23%
Uranium Energy Corp. 1.61% 4.00%
Paladin Energy Ltd 1.03% 3.41%
Denison Mines Corp 0.83% 2.96%
Vistra Corp. 4.34% 0.79%
Yellow Cake Plc 0.63% 1.84%
Fortum Oyj 1.98% 0.15%
AtkinsRealis Group Inc. 0.71% 0.14%
Only in RCTR
Hitachi, Ltd. 5.75%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd. 5.08%
Constellation Energy Corporation 5.03%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. 4.91%
BHP Group Limited 4.77%
Duke Energy Corporation 4.17%
Entergy Corporation 4.08%
Talen Energy Corporation 4.06%
Only in SMRF
Cgn Power Co Ltd 4.28%
Oklo Inc 4.22%
Nac Kazatomprom Jsc 3.82%
Nuscale Power Corp 3.77%
Energy Fuels Inc/canada 3.54%
Centrus Energy Corp 3.17%
Astera Labs Inc 2.83%
Micron Technology Inc 2.43%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

29% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowRCTRSMRFRCTRSMRFRCTRSMRF
3 months−3.6%−11.2%−6.1 pts−13.7 pts−5.7 pts−13.3 pts
6 months−10.6%−2.9%−27.6 pts−19.9 pts−37.5 pts−29.8 pts
1 year−2.0%not published−17.7 ptsnot published−25.8 ptsnot published
Since launch
RCTR Jul 2025 · SMRF Feb 2026
+6.0%−11.7%−16.3 pts−24.0 pts−25.7 pts−34.7 pts

RCTR and SMRF over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF · Holds 50 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 28% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
SMRF
ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF · Holds 72 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 28% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer First Trust ALPS
Theme Nuclear and uranium Nuclear and uranium
In the S&P 500 27.5% 27.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.9% 92.5%
In the Nasdaq-100 5.0% 14.4%
Holdings 50 72
Top ten, share of the fund 46.9% 40.2%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.65%
Fee for the differing part 0.71% 0.70%
Total return, 1 year −2.0% −11.7% (since launch on Feb 19, 2026)
vs the S&P 500 −17.7 pts −24.0 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −25.8 pts −34.7 pts
Below its high −17.8% −22.1%
Net assets $29m $11m

RCTR and SMRF on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

RCTR in plain words

By weight, 28% of RCTR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 50 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 17.7 pts. It sits 17.8% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

SMRF in plain words

By weight, 28% of SMRF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 72 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Since it launched on Feb 19, 2026 the fund returned −11.7% with distributions reinvested against +12.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 24.0 pts. It sits 22.1% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do RCTR and SMRF hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, RCTR or SMRF?
RCTR has 28% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SMRF has 28%, so RCTR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, RCTR or SMRF?
RCTR charges 0.70% a year and SMRF charges 0.65%, so SMRF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, RCTR against SMRF, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rctr-vs-smrf

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.