Do QQQJ and XT hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, QQQJ or XT?

QQQJ has 47% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 65%, so QQQJ differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, QQQJ or XT?

QQQJ charges 0.15% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so QQQJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

QQQJ vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QQQJ returned +25.2% to XT's +23.4%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QQQJ and XT

Net assets: $1.2bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF, and $4.0bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.

QQQJ on its own →XT on its own →

At a glance

46.7%

QQQJ in the S&P 500

65.0%

XT in the S&P 500

+25.2%

QQQJ total return, 1 year

+23.4%

XT total return, 1 year

QQQJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 53% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

47% of QQQJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

XT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 35% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

65% of XT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QQQJ costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.8 points; XT is 3.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QQQJ vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	QQQJ	XT
Return
Measure	QQQJ	XT
Total return, 1 year	+25.2%	+23.4%
Against its benchmark
Measure	QQQJ	XT
What it tracks	Broad innovation and megatrends	Broad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	ahead by 10.4 pts	ahead by 8.4 pts
Cost and size
Measure	QQQJ	XT
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.46%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$1.2bn	$4.0bn
Holdings
Measure	QQQJ	XT
Holdings in common	3%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	20%	36%

Method

Risk and return

Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 30, 2026 · 314 weekly returns

QQQJ XT

Return

Total return edge XT +74.3% +84.3%

Annualized edge XT (slight) +9.6% +10.7%

Price return edge QQQJ (slight) +66.1% +64.8%

Risk

Volatility edge XT (slight) 21.0% 19.8%

Max drawdown edge XT −39.2% −34.3%

Downside capture 113.1% 108.5%

Beta 1.17 1.11

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge XT 0.39 0.45

Sortino edge XT 0.57 0.65

Treynor 0.069 0.103

Calmar edge XT 0.25 0.31

Against the benchmark

Alpha −5.5% a year +1.3% a year

Alpha t-stat −1.48 0.68

Information ratio −0.37 0.35

Tracking error 9.4% 6.5%

Each against its own benchmark: QQQJ against IWV, Oct 23, 2020 to Oct 30, 2026; XT against ACWI, Apr 2, 2015 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Oct 2020 to Oct 2026, XT returned more: +84.3% to +74.3%. XT swung slightly less: 19.8% to 21.0%. XT fell less at its worst: −34.3% to −39.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: QQQJ vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	QQQJ	XT	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+74.3%	+84.3%	XT	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+9.6%	+10.7%	XT (slight)	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+66.1%	+64.8%	QQQJ (slight)	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	21.0%	19.8%	XT (slight)	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	14.2%	13.5%	XT (slight)	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−39.2%	−34.3%	XT	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture	113.3%	123.1%		Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture	113.1%	108.5%		Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta	1.17	1.11	Not an edge	How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared	0.82	0.89	Not an edge	Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.39	0.45	XT	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.57	0.65	XT	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor	0.069	0.103		Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar	0.25	0.31	XT	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
Benchmark	IWV	ACWI		The ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha	−5.5% a year	+1.3% a year	Not significant	Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat	−1.48	0.68	Not an edge	How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range	−12.7% to +1.8%	−2.3% to +4.9%	Includes zero	The 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio	−0.37	0.35		Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error	9.4%	6.5%	Not an edge	How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 314 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, QQQJ and XT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

3% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QQQJ XT

Sanofi SA 0.49% 0.50%

ON Semiconductor Corp 1.43% 0.46%

Okta Inc 1.60% 0.32%

First Solar Inc 1.01% 0.19%

Biogen Inc 1.86% 0.18%

Illumina Inc 1.82% 0.17%

Gen Digital Inc 0.90% 0.16%

Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc 0.78% 0.16%

Nextpower Inc 0.74% 0.14%

Akamai Technologies Inc 0.63% 0.13%

Guardant Health Inc 1.19% 0.11%

Bridgebio Pharma Inc 0.75% 0.06%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in QQQJ

Natera Inc 2.83%

eBay Inc 2.67%

Revolution Medicines Inc 2.10%

NetApp Inc 1.89%

Steel Dynamics Inc 1.79%

Elbit Systems Ltd 1.79%

United Airlines Holdings Inc 1.76%

Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.75%

Only in XT

ELI LILLY 4.83%

TEXAS INSTRUMENT 4.69%

TESLA INC 4.43%

MICROSOFT 4.10%

NVIDIA 3.53%

ANALOG DEVICES 3.34%

PALO ALTO NETWORKS 3.26%

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.04%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: QQQJ vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	QQQJ	XT	QQQJ	XT
3 months	−1.2%	+2.8%	−0.9 pts vs IWV	+4.1 pts vs ACWI
6 months	+6.2%	+7.5%	+1.3 pts vs IWV	+4.9 pts vs ACWI
1 year	+25.2%	+23.4%	+10.4 pts vs IWV	+8.4 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+91.2%	+78.5%	+10.2 pts vs IWV	+0.9 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: QQQJ Oct 2020 · XT Mar 2015	+74.3%	+293.9%	−53.2 pts vs IWV	+69.3 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF · Holds 106 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 47% of its weight in S&P 500 companies XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · Holds 196 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 65% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Invesco iShares

Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends

In the S&P 500 46.7% 65.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.6% 69.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 39.9%

Holdings 106 196

Top ten, share of the fund 20.3% 36.5%

Expense ratio 0.15% 0.46%

Fee for the differing part 0.15% 0.66%

Total return, 1 year +25.2% +23.4%

vs its benchmark +10.4 pts vs IWV +8.4 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −4.4% −1.5%

Net assets, QQQJ as of Nov 3, 2026 and XT as of Nov 4, 2026 $1.2bn $4.0bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

3% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

QQQJ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +25.2% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was ahead by 10.4 pts.

By weight, 47% of QQQJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 20% of the fund across 106 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026.

By weight, 65% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 70%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 196 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 8.4 pts.

Questions people ask

Do QQQJ and XT hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, QQQJ or XT?: QQQJ has 47% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 65%, so QQQJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, QQQJ or XT?: QQQJ charges 0.15% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so QQQJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

QQQJ vs ARKK QQQJ vs TMAT QQQJ vs XDAT QQQJ vs ILDR XT vs FDTX XT vs FRWD XT vs ARKK XT vs GTEK

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →QQQJ on its own →XT on its own →QQQJ dividend history →QQQJ holdings →XT dividend history →XT holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

QQQJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

QQQJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Invesco page for QQQJ ↗

XT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for XT ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QQQJ against XT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/qqqj-vs-xt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.