Data as of .
QQQJ vs XDAT: which is really different?
QQQJ and XDAT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and QQQJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: QQQJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
3% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QQQJ and XDAT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QQQJ | XDAT |
|---|---|---|
| MongoDB Inc | 1.56% | 3.75% |
| Okta Inc | 1.53% | 0.90% |
| Akamai Technologies Inc | 0.77% | 0.79% |
| Only in QQQJ | Only in XDAT |
|---|---|
| Natera Inc 2.67% | CLOUDFLARE INC 10.14% |
| eBay Inc 2.51% | ALPHABET INC 9.76% |
| Revolution Medicines Inc 2.05% | META PLATFORMS INC 6.43% |
| Flex Ltd 2.01% | SNOWFLAKE INC 5.03% |
| NetApp Inc 1.97% | APPLOVIN CORP 5.02% |
| Illumina Inc 1.83% | PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 4.54% |
| United Airlines Holdings Inc 1.78% | CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 4.39% |
| Elbit Systems Ltd 1.75% | DATADOG INC 4.11% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQJ | XDAT | QQQJ | XDAT | QQQJ | XDAT | |
| 3 months | −0.9% | +10.6% | −3.1 pts | +8.3 pts | +1.6 pts | +13.1 pts |
| 6 months | +22.6% | +23.9% | +4.6 pts | +5.9 pts | −1.6 pts | −0.3 pts |
| 1 year | +22.4% | −4.8% | +5.8 pts | −21.4 pts | +0.7 pts | −26.6 pts |
| 3 years | +80.4% | +47.1% | +2.0 pts | −31.3 pts | −17.8 pts | −51.1 pts |
| Since launch | +72.2% | +9.1% | −63.7 pts | −108.2 pts | −81.2 pts | −127.9 pts |
| QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF Holds 108 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 46% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF Holds 59 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 61% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Invesco | Franklin |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 46.2% | 61.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 98.6% | 86.2% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 1.4% | 49.6% |
| Holdings | 108 | 59 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 19.9% | 56.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.15% | 0.58% |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.4% | −4.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +5.8 pts | −21.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +0.7 pts | −26.6 pts |
| Below its high | −5.5% | −12.3% |
| Net assets | $1.2bn | $4m |
QQQJ in plain words
By weight, 46% of QQQJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 20% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 19, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +22.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.8 pts. It sits 5.5% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
XDAT in plain words
By weight, 61% of XDAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 21.4 pts. It sits 12.3% below its all-time high of Nov 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do QQQJ and XDAT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, QQQJ or XDAT?
- QQQJ has 46% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XDAT has 61%, so QQQJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, QQQJ or XDAT?
- QQQJ charges 0.15% a year and XDAT charges 0.50%, so QQQJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQJ against XDAT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/qqqj-vs-xdat Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.