Do XDAT and XT hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, XDAT or XT?

XDAT has 60% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 65%, so XDAT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, XDAT or XT?

XDAT charges 0.50% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so XT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

XDAT vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, XDAT returned −11.5% to XT's +23.4%; 17% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about XDAT and XT

Net assets: $3.7m on Nov 3, 2026 for Franklin Exponential Data ETF, and $4.0bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.

XDAT on its own →XT on its own →

At a glance

60.4%

XDAT in the S&P 500

65.0%

XT in the S&P 500

−11.5%

XDAT total return, 1 year

+23.4%

XT total return, 1 year

XDAT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 40% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

60% of XDAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 40% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

XT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 35% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

65% of XT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

XT costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 34.9 points; XT is far larger, $4.0bn against $3.7m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

XDAT vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	XDAT	XT
Return
Measure	XDAT	XT
Total return, 1 year	−11.5%	+23.4%
Drawdown
Measure	XDAT	XT
Below its all-time high	21.1%, high on Nov 9, 2021
Against its benchmark
Measure	XDAT	XT
What it tracks	Broad innovation and megatrends	Broad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 26.3 pts	ahead by 8.4 pts
Cost and size
Measure	XDAT	XT
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.46%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$3.7m	$4.0bn
Holdings
Measure	XDAT	XT
Holdings in common	17%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	56%	36%

ETFIQ S&P 500 Difference Score · XDAT scores higher How much of its weight does it not share with the S&P 500?

IQ Themes Score53.9XDAT15.4XT

How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed

XDAT 53.9

XT 15.4

0.4, the lowest in this set 99.6, the highest

Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

17%

By the books each fund has filed, XDAT and XT hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

17% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first XDAT XT

MICROSOFT CORP 3.52% 4.10%

PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 4.49% 3.26%

CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 4.34% 2.63%

ALPHABET INC 9.66% 1.75%

META PLATFORMS INC 6.36% 1.35%

CLOUDFLARE INC 10.04% 0.96%

FORTINET INC 0.83% 0.87%

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.87% 0.44%

COINBASE GLOBAL INC 0.56% 0.32%

OKTA INC 0.89% 0.32%

ZSCALER INC 0.86% 0.26%

ORACLE CORP 2.61% 0.21%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in XDAT

DATADOG INC 4.07%

JFROG LTD 3.41%

NEBIUS GROUP NV 2.47%

ROKU INC 2.39%

SANDISK CORP 2.19%

COREWEAVE INC 1.73%

T-MOBILE US INC 1.60%

EQUINIX INC 1.06%

Only in XT

ELI LILLY 4.83%

TEXAS INSTRUMENT 4.69%

TESLA INC 4.43%

NVIDIA 3.53%

ANALOG DEVICES 3.34%

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.04%

AMAZON.COM INC 2.64%

ABBVIE 2.48%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: XDAT vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	XDAT	XT	XDAT	XT
3 months	−7.7%	+2.8%	−7.4 pts vs IWV	+4.1 pts vs ACWI
6 months	+2.1%	+7.5%	−2.8 pts vs IWV	+4.9 pts vs ACWI
1 year	−11.5%	+23.4%	−26.3 pts vs IWV	+8.4 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+33.3%	+78.5%	−47.7 pts vs IWV	+0.9 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: XDAT Jan 2021 · XT Mar 2015	−1.8%	+293.9%	−106.1 pts vs IWV	+69.3 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF · Holds 59 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 60% of its weight in S&P 500 companies XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · Holds 196 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 65% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Franklin iShares

Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends

In the S&P 500 60.4% 65.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 86.2% 69.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 52.2% 39.9%

Holdings 59 196

Top ten, share of the fund 56.1% 36.5%

Expense ratio 0.50% 0.46%

Fee for the differing part 0.58% 0.66%

Total return, 1 year −11.5% +23.4%

vs its benchmark −26.3 pts vs IWV +8.4 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −21.1% −1.5%

Net assets, XDAT as of Nov 3, 2026 and XT as of Nov 4, 2026 $3.7m $4.0bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

17% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

XDAT

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −11.5% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 26.3 pts.

By weight, 60% of XDAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. It sits 21.1% below its all-time high of Nov 9, 2021.

By weight, 65% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 70%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 196 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 8.4 pts.

Questions people ask

Do XDAT and XT hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, XDAT or XT?: XDAT has 60% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 65%, so XDAT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, XDAT or XT?: XDAT charges 0.50% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so XT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

XDAT vs ARKK XDAT vs ABOT XDAT vs QQQJ XDAT vs ILDR XT vs ARKK XT vs ABOT XT vs BUYZ XT vs GXDW

Where to next

XDAT on its own →XT on its own →XDAT dividend history →XDAT holdings →XT dividend history →XT holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

XDAT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XDAT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Franklin website ↗

XT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for XT ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, XDAT against XT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/xdat-vs-xt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.