Do ABOT and XDAT hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, ABOT or XDAT?

ABOT has 64% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XDAT has 60%, so XDAT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, ABOT or XDAT?

ABOT charges 0.39% a year and XDAT charges 0.50%, so ABOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

ABOT vs XDAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ABOT returned +13.5% to XDAT's −11.5%; 13% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ABOT and XDAT

Net assets: $4.0m on Jul 31, 2026 for Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF, and $3.7m on Nov 3, 2026 for Franklin Exponential Data ETF.

ABOT on its own →XDAT on its own →

At a glance

64.4%

ABOT in the S&P 500

60.4%

XDAT in the S&P 500

+13.5%

ABOT total return, 1 year

−11.5%

XDAT total return, 1 year

ABOT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 36% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

64% of ABOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 36% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

XDAT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 40% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

60% of XDAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 40% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ABOT costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.0 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ABOT vs XDAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	ABOT	XDAT
Return
Measure	ABOT	XDAT
Total return, 1 year	+13.5%	−11.5%
Drawdown
Measure	ABOT	XDAT
Below its all-time high		21.1%, high on Nov 9, 2021
Against its benchmark
Measure	ABOT	XDAT
What it tracks	Broad innovation and megatrends	Broad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 26.3 pts
Cost and size
Measure	ABOT	XDAT
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.50%
Net assets, ABOT as of Jul 31, 2026 and XDAT as of Nov 3, 2026	$4.0m	$3.7m
Holdings
Measure	ABOT	XDAT
Holdings in common	13%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	32%	56%

ETFIQ S&P 500 Difference Score · XDAT scores higher How much of its weight does it not share with the S&P 500?

IQ Themes Score46.1ABOT53.9XDAT

How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed

ABOT 46.1

XDAT 53.9

0.4, the lowest in this set 99.6, the highest

Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

13%

By the books each fund has filed, ABOT and XDAT hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

13% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ABOT XDAT

Snowflake Inc 2.68% 4.97%

Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.54% 4.49%

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 2.07% 4.34%

Datadog Inc 2.06% 4.07%

AppLovin Corp 1.21% 4.97%

Fortinet Inc 2.54% 0.83%

ServiceNow Inc 1.93% 0.80%

Rubrik Inc 1.43% 0.42%

ROBLOX Corp 1.63% 0.26%

Bentley Systems Inc 1.27% 0.21%

Autodesk Inc 2.54% 0.19%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in ABOT

Apple Inc 4.94%

NVIDIA Corp 4.75%

Broadcom Inc 3.90%

AbbVie Inc 3.25%

Airbnb Inc 2.73%

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.61%

Adobe Inc 2.54%

VeriSign Inc 2.53%

Only in XDAT

CLOUDFLARE INC 10.04%

ALPHABET INC 9.66%

META PLATFORMS INC 6.36%

MONGODB INC 3.71%

MICROSOFT CORP 3.52%

JFROG LTD 3.41%

ORACLE CORP 2.61%

NEBIUS GROUP NV 2.47%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ABOT vs XDAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	ABOT	XDAT	ABOT	XDAT
3 months	+7.7%	−7.7%	not measured	−7.4 pts vs IWV
6 months	+24.2%	+2.1%	not measured	−2.8 pts vs IWV
1 year	+13.5%	−11.5%	not measured	−26.3 pts vs IWV
3 years	+86.1%	+33.3%	not measured	−47.7 pts vs IWV
Since launchNot the same days: ABOT Dec 2020 · XDAT Jan 2021	+94.5%	−1.8%	not measured	−106.1 pts vs IWV

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF · Holds 50 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 64% of its weight in S&P 500 companies XDAT Franklin Exponential Data ETF · Holds 59 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 60% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Abacus FCF Franklin

Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends

In the S&P 500 64.4% 60.4%

Active share vs the S&P 500 83.7% 86.2%

In the Nasdaq-100 42.3% 52.2%

Holdings 50 59

Top ten, share of the fund 32.5% 56.1%

Expense ratio 0.39% 0.50%

Fee for the differing part 0.47% 0.58%

Total return, 1 year +13.5% −11.5%

vs its benchmark not measured −26.3 pts vs IWV

Below its high −3.4% −21.1%

Net assets, ABOT as of Jul 31, 2026 and XDAT as of Nov 3, 2026 $4.0m $3.7m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

13% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

ABOT

By weight, 64% of ABOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested.

XDAT

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −11.5% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 26.3 pts.

By weight, 60% of XDAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. It sits 21.1% below its all-time high of Nov 9, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do ABOT and XDAT hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ABOT or XDAT?: ABOT has 64% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XDAT has 60%, so XDAT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ABOT or XDAT?: ABOT charges 0.39% a year and XDAT charges 0.50%, so ABOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ABOT vs BUYZ ABOT vs GXDW ABOT vs TNXT ABOT vs TEKY XDAT vs XT XDAT vs BUYZ XDAT vs GXDW XDAT vs BULD

Where to next

ABOT on its own →XDAT on its own →ABOT dividend history →ABOT holdings →XDAT dividend history →XDAT holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ABOT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ABOT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Abacus FCF website ↗

XDAT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

XDAT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Franklin website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ABOT against XDAT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/abot-vs-xdat

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.