Data as of .
ABOT vs GXDW: which is really different?
ABOT and GXDW hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ABOT returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GXDW scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ABOT and GXDW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ABOT | Only in GXDW |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 6.32% | GLOBAL X HYDROGEN ETF 20.93% |
| Apple Inc 5.46% | GLOBAL X GENOMICS & BIOTECHN 20.55% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.61% | GLOBAL X CYBERSECURITY ETF 20.21% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 3.21% | GLOBAL X ART INTEL & TECH 19.89% |
| QUALCOMM Inc 3.18% | GLOBAL X LITHIUM & BATTERY T 18.41% |
| Airbnb Inc 3.06% | OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES 0.01% |
| VeriSign Inc 2.88% | CASH -0.01% |
| AbbVie Inc 2.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABOT | GXDW | ABOT | GXDW | ABOT | GXDW | |
| 3 months | +15.7% | −13.3% | +13.4 pts | −15.5 pts | +18.2 pts | −10.8 pts |
| 6 months | +30.5% | +10.8% | +12.4 pts | −7.2 pts | +6.2 pts | −13.4 pts |
| 1 year | +7.7% | −10.2% | −8.9 pts | −26.8 pts | −14.1 pts | −32.0 pts |
| 3 years | +76.5% | +3.7% | −1.9 pts | −74.7 pts | −21.6 pts | −94.5 pts |
| Since launch | +88.3% | +2.3% | −34.9 pts | −171.8 pts | −53.9 pts | −273.6 pts |
| ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF Holds 54 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 70% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF Holds 7 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Abacus FCF | Global X |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 70.2% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 80.9% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 46.5% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 54 | 7 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 36.5% | 100.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.48% | 0.50% |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.7% | −10.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −8.9 pts | −26.8 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −14.1 pts | −32.0 pts |
| Below its high | −2.4% | −59.4% |
| Net assets | $4m | $6m |
ABOT in plain words
By weight, 70% of ABOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 54 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +7.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 8.9 pts.
GXDW in plain words
By weight, 0% of GXDW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 7 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −10.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 26.8 pts. It sits 59.4% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do ABOT and GXDW hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, ABOT or GXDW?
- ABOT has 70% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GXDW has 0%, so GXDW differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, ABOT or GXDW?
- ABOT charges 0.39% a year and GXDW charges 0.50%, so ABOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ABOT against GXDW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/abot-vs-gxdw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.