Do ABOT and GXDW hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, ABOT or GXDW?

ABOT has 64% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GXDW has 0%, so GXDW differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, ABOT or GXDW?

ABOT charges 0.39% a year and GXDW charges 0.50%, so ABOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

ABOT vs GXDW: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ABOT returned +13.5% to GXDW's −13.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ABOT and GXDW

Net assets: $4.0m on Jul 31, 2026 for Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF, and $6.0m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF.

ABOT on its own →GXDW on its own →

At a glance

64.4%

ABOT in the S&P 500

0.0%

GXDW in the S&P 500

+13.5%

ABOT total return, 1 year

−13.8%

GXDW total return, 1 year

ABOT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 36% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

64% of ABOT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 36% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

GXDW · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of GXDW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ABOT costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.3 points.

ABOT vs GXDW: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	ABOT	GXDW
Return
Measure	ABOT	GXDW
Total return, 1 year	+13.5%	−13.8%
Drawdown
Measure	ABOT	GXDW
Below its all-time high		61.7%, high on Feb 10, 2021
Benchmark
Measure	ABOT	GXDW
What it tracks	Broad innovation and megatrends	Broad innovation and megatrends
Cost and size
Measure	ABOT	GXDW
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.50%
Net assets, ABOT as of Jul 31, 2026 and GXDW as of Oct 12, 2026	$4.0m	$6.0m
Holdings
Measure	ABOT	GXDW
Holdings in common	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	32%	100%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, ABOT and GXDW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ABOT GXDW

Only in one fund ↓

Only in ABOT

Apple Inc 4.94%

NVIDIA Corp 4.75%

Broadcom Inc 3.90%

AbbVie Inc 3.25%

Airbnb Inc 2.73%

Snowflake Inc 2.68%

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.61%

Adobe Inc 2.54%

Only in GXDW

Global X Cybersecurity ETF 21.19%

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF 20.36%

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF 20.15%

Global X Hydrogen ETF 19.58%

Global X Internet of Things ETF 18.70%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ABOT vs GXDW: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	ABOT	GXDW
3 months	+7.7%	−4.0%
6 months	+24.2%	−20.3%
1 year	+13.5%	−13.8%
3 years	+86.1%	+7.4%
Since launchNot the same days: ABOT Dec 2020 · GXDW Nov 2019	+94.5%	−3.6%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF · Holds 50 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 64% of its weight in S&P 500 companies GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF · Holds 5 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Abacus FCF Global X

Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends

In the S&P 500 64.4% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 83.7% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 42.3% 0.0%

Holdings 50 5

Top ten, share of the fund 32.5% 100.0%

Expense ratio 0.39% 0.50%

Fee for the differing part 0.47% 0.50%

Total return, 1 year +13.5% −13.8%

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −3.4% −61.7%

Net assets, ABOT as of Jul 31, 2026 and GXDW as of Oct 12, 2026 $4.0m $6.0m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

ABOT

By weight, 64% of ABOT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested.

GXDW

By weight, 0% of GXDW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 5 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 61.7% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do ABOT and GXDW hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ABOT or GXDW?: ABOT has 64% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GXDW has 0%, so GXDW differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ABOT or GXDW?: ABOT charges 0.39% a year and GXDW charges 0.50%, so ABOT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ABOT vs BUYZ ABOT vs BULD ABOT vs INVN ABOT vs XDAT GXDW vs XDAT GXDW vs INVN GXDW vs TNXT GXDW vs THMZ

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →ABOT on its own →GXDW on its own →ABOT dividend history →ABOT holdings →GXDW dividend history →GXDW holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ABOT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ABOT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Abacus FCF website ↗

GXDW filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

GXDW prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for GXDW ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ABOT against GXDW, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/abot-vs-gxdw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.