IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

GXDW vs THMZ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GXDW returned −13.8% to THMZ's +6.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GXDW and THMZ

Net assets: $6.0m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF, and $54m on Jun 30, 2026 for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF.

GXDW on its own →THMZ on its own →
At a glance
0.0%
GXDW in the S&P 500
53.9%
THMZ in the S&P 500
−13.8%
GXDW total return, 1 year
+6.1%
THMZ total return, 1 year
GXDW · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of GXDW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 100% of the fund · 5 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of GXDW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of GXDW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

THMZ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 46% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of THMZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.54%46%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 74% · top ten 34% of the fund · 59 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 30% in46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of THMZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.54%46%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 74% · Nasdaq-100: 30% in

54% of THMZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.50% a year; their one-year returns differ by 19.9 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GXDW vs THMZ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGXDWTHMZ
Return
Total return, 1 year−13.8%+6.1%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high61.7%, high on Feb 10, 2021
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBroad innovation and megatrendsBroad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 8.9 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.50%
Net assets, GXDW as of Oct 12, 2026 and THMZ as of Jun 30, 2026$6.0m$54m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GXDW and THMZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GXDW THMZ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GXDW
Global X Cybersecurity ETF 21.19%
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF 20.36%
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF 20.15%
Global X Hydrogen ETF 19.58%
Global X Internet of Things ETF 18.70%
Only in THMZ
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 6.07%
Applied Materials Inc 5.54%
Alphabet Inc 3.54%
Amazon.com Inc 3.50%
Microsoft Corp 2.77%
NVIDIA Corp 2.76%
Mitsubishi Electric Corp 2.72%
Keysight Technologies Inc 2.59%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: GXDW vs THMZ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowGXDWTHMZGXDWTHMZ
3 months−4.0%−2.0%not measured−0.7 pts vs ACWI
6 months−20.3%+2.8%not measured+0.2 pts vs ACWI
1 year−13.8%+6.1%not measured−8.9 pts vs ACWI
3 years+7.4%–not measured–
Since launchNot the same days: GXDW Nov 2019 · THMZ Apr 2025−3.6%+38.4%not measured−16.1 pts vs ACWI

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF · Holds 5 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF · Holds 59 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 54% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Global X Lazard
Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends
In the S&P 500 0.0% 53.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 73.5%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 29.5%
Holdings 5 59
Top ten, share of the fund 100.0% 34.3%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.50%
Fee for the differing part 0.50% 0.68%
Total return, 1 year −13.8% +6.1%
vs its benchmark not measured −8.9 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −61.7% −2.6%
Net assets, GXDW as of Oct 12, 2026 and THMZ as of Jun 30, 2026 $6.0m $54m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GXDW

By weight, 0% of GXDW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 5 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 61.7% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.

THMZ

By weight, 54% of THMZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 74%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +6.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 8.9 pts.

Questions people ask

Do GXDW and THMZ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GXDW or THMZ?
GXDW has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and THMZ has 54%, so GXDW differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GXDW or THMZ?
GXDW and THMZ both charge 0.50% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
GXDW vs TEKYGXDW vs CARZGXDW vs FDCFGXDW vs AOTGTHMZ vs BUYZTHMZ vs BULDTHMZ vs ABOTTHMZ vs INVN
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →GXDW on its own →THMZ on its own →GXDW dividend history →GXDW holdings →THMZ dividend history →THMZ holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
GXDW filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
GXDW prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Global X page for GXDW ↗
THMZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
THMZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Lazard website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GXDW against THMZ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gxdw-vs-thmz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.