Data as of .
GXDW vs THMZ: which is really different?
GXDW and THMZ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and THMZ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GXDW scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GXDW and THMZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GXDW | Only in THMZ |
|---|---|
| GLOBAL X HYDROGEN ETF 20.93% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 6.22% |
| GLOBAL X GENOMICS & BIOTECHN 20.55% | Applied Materials Inc 5.68% |
| GLOBAL X CYBERSECURITY ETF 20.21% | Alphabet Inc 3.63% |
| GLOBAL X ART INTEL & TECH 19.89% | Amazon.com Inc 3.58% |
| GLOBAL X LITHIUM & BATTERY T 18.41% | Microsoft Corp 2.84% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES 0.01% | NVIDIA Corp 2.83% |
| CASH -0.01% | Mitsubishi Electric Corp 2.79% |
| Keysight Technologies Inc 2.66% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXDW | THMZ | GXDW | THMZ | GXDW | THMZ | |
| 3 months | −13.3% | +0.3% | −15.5 pts | −1.9 pts | −10.8 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 6 months | +10.8% | +17.1% | −7.2 pts | −1.0 pts | −13.4 pts | −7.2 pts |
| 1 year | −10.2% | +7.2% | −26.8 pts | −9.4 pts | −32.0 pts | −14.6 pts |
| 3 years | +3.7% | not published | −74.7 pts | not published | −94.5 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +2.3% | +37.0% | −171.8 pts | −16.5 pts | −273.6 pts | −34.3 pts |
| GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF Holds 7 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF Holds 59 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 55% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Lazard |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 55.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 73.1% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 30.2% |
| Holdings | 7 | 59 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 100.0% | 35.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.50% | 0.68% |
| Total return, 1 year | −10.2% | +7.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −26.8 pts | −9.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −32.0 pts | −14.6 pts |
| Below its high | −59.4% | −3.5% |
| Net assets | $6m | $54m |
GXDW in plain words
By weight, 0% of GXDW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 7 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −10.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 26.8 pts. It sits 59.4% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.
THMZ in plain words
By weight, 55% of THMZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 73%. The top ten holdings are 35% of the fund across 59 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do GXDW and THMZ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, GXDW or THMZ?
- GXDW has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and THMZ has 55%, so GXDW differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, GXDW or THMZ?
- GXDW charges 0.50% a year and THMZ charges 0.50%, so GXDW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GXDW against THMZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gxdw-vs-thmz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.