Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
AOTG vs GXDW: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AOTG returned +3.2% to GXDW's −13.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AOTG and GXDW
Net assets: $105m on Aug 31, 2026 for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF, and $6.0m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF.
74% of AOTG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 26% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
0% of GXDW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
GXDW costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.0 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | AOTG | GXDW |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.2% | −13.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 14.7%, high on Oct 7, 2026 | 61.7%, high on Feb 10, 2021 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.4% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 11.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, AOTG as of Aug 31, 2026 and GXDW as of Oct 12, 2026 | $105m | $6.0m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64% | 100% |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AOTG and GXDW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AOTG | GXDW | AOTG | GXDW |
| 3 months | −7.6% | −4.0% | −7.1 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
| 6 months | −1.1% | −20.3% | −5.8 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
| 1 year | +3.2% | −13.8% | −11.2 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
| 3 years | +101.5% | +7.4% | +19.6 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: AOTG Jun 2022 · GXDW Nov 2019 | +139.7% | −3.6% | +29.2 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.2% with distributions reinvested against +14.4% for its benchmark, the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts.
By weight, 74% of AOTG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. It sits 14.7% below its all-time high of Oct 7, 2026.
GXDW
By weight, 0% of GXDW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 5 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 61.7% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do AOTG and GXDW hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AOTG against GXDW, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-gxdw
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). AOTG against GXDW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-gxdw
[AOTG against GXDW (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-gxdw)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.