Data as of .
GXDW vs LFSC: which is really different?
GXDW and LFSC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and LFSC returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GXDW scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GXDW and LFSC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GXDW | Only in LFSC |
|---|---|
| GLOBAL X HYDROGEN ETF 20.93% | Travere Therapeutics Inc 7.66% |
| GLOBAL X GENOMICS & BIOTECHN 20.55% | Cogent Biosciences Inc 7.52% |
| GLOBAL X CYBERSECURITY ETF 20.21% | LivaNova PLC 7.11% |
| GLOBAL X ART INTEL & TECH 19.89% | Spyre Therapeutics Inc 6.41% |
| GLOBAL X LITHIUM & BATTERY T 18.41% | Guardant Health Inc 5.51% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES 0.01% | Mirum Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.92% |
| CASH -0.01% | Corcept Therapeutics Inc 4.79% |
| United Therapeutics Corp 4.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GXDW | LFSC | GXDW | LFSC | GXDW | LFSC | |
| 3 months | −13.3% | +8.7% | −15.5 pts | +6.5 pts | −10.8 pts | +11.2 pts |
| 6 months | +10.8% | +36.0% | −7.2 pts | +17.9 pts | −13.4 pts | +11.7 pts |
| 1 year | −10.2% | +53.0% | −26.8 pts | +36.5 pts | −32.0 pts | +31.3 pts |
| 3 years | +3.7% | not published | −74.7 pts | not published | −94.5 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +2.3% | +81.3% | −171.8 pts | +44.3 pts | −273.6 pts | +30.9 pts |
| GXDW Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF Holds 7 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF Holds 39 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | F/m |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.6% |
| Holdings | 7 | 39 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 100.0% | 54.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.54% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.50% | 0.54% |
| Total return, 1 year | −10.2% | +53.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −26.8 pts | +36.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −32.0 pts | +31.3 pts |
| Below its high | −59.4% | −6.8% |
| Net assets | $6m | $105m |
GXDW in plain words
By weight, 0% of GXDW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 7 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −10.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 26.8 pts. It sits 59.4% below its all-time high of Feb 10, 2021.
LFSC in plain words
By weight, 0% of LFSC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +53.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 36.5 pts. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Aug 19, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GXDW and LFSC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, GXDW or LFSC?
- GXDW has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LFSC has 0%, so GXDW differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, GXDW or LFSC?
- GXDW charges 0.50% a year and LFSC charges 0.54%, so GXDW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GXDW against LFSC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gxdw-vs-lfsc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.