Data as of .
QQQJ vs TMAT: which is really different?
QQQJ and TMAT hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and QQQJ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: QQQJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
6% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QQQJ and TMAT hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QQQJ | TMAT |
|---|---|---|
| F5 Inc | 1.23% | 1.24% |
| Woodward Inc | 0.97% | 1.38% |
| Gen Digital Inc | 0.88% | 0.91% |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 1.71% | 0.79% |
| Trimble Inc | 0.68% | 0.89% |
| Elbit Systems Ltd | 1.75% | 0.64% |
| Insulet Corp | 0.49% | 1.18% |
| Kratos Defense & Security Solutions Inc | 0.45% | 0.60% |
| AeroVironment Inc | 0.40% | 0.59% |
| Only in QQQJ | Only in TMAT |
|---|---|
| Natera Inc 2.67% | VICOR CORP 2.98% |
| eBay Inc 2.51% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.81% |
| Revolution Medicines Inc 2.05% | LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 2.75% |
| Flex Ltd 2.01% | CIENA CORP 2.61% |
| NetApp Inc 1.97% | PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 2.55% |
| Illumina Inc 1.83% | CLEAR SECURE INC 2.48% |
| United Airlines Holdings Inc 1.78% | KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.26% |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp 1.66% | MODINE MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1.94% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQJ | TMAT | QQQJ | TMAT | QQQJ | TMAT | |
| 3 months | −0.9% | −5.8% | −3.1 pts | −8.1 pts | +1.6 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 6 months | +22.6% | +21.2% | +4.6 pts | +3.1 pts | −1.6 pts | −3.1 pts |
| 1 year | +22.4% | +3.5% | +5.8 pts | −13.0 pts | +0.7 pts | −18.2 pts |
| 3 years | +80.4% | +105.6% | +2.0 pts | +27.2 pts | −17.8 pts | +7.4 pts |
| Since launch | +72.2% | +16.5% | −63.7 pts | −105.8 pts | −81.2 pts | −120.4 pts |
| QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF Holds 108 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 46% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF Holds 88 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 46% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Invesco | Main |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 46.2% | 46.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 98.6% | 91.5% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 1.4% | 22.9% |
| Holdings | 108 | 88 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 19.9% | 24.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.82% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.15% | 0.90% |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.4% | +3.5% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +5.8 pts | −13.0 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +0.7 pts | −18.2 pts |
| Below its high | −5.5% | −9.0% |
| Net assets | $1.2bn | $211m |
QQQJ in plain words
By weight, 46% of QQQJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 20% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 19, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +22.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.8 pts. It sits 5.5% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
TMAT in plain words
By weight, 46% of TMAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 24% of the fund across 88 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 13.0 pts. It sits 9.0% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do QQQJ and TMAT hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, QQQJ or TMAT?
- QQQJ has 46% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TMAT has 46%, so QQQJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, QQQJ or TMAT?
- QQQJ charges 0.15% a year and TMAT charges 0.82%, so QQQJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQJ against TMAT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/qqqj-vs-tmat Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.