Do ARKK and TMAT hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, ARKK or TMAT?

ARKK has 36% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TMAT has 50%, so TMAT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, ARKK or TMAT?

ARKK charges 0.75% a year and TMAT charges 0.79%, so ARKK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

ARKK vs TMAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ARKK returned −3.7% to TMAT's −3.1%; 6% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ARKK and TMAT

Net assets: $5.9bn on Nov 2, 2026 for ARK Innovation ETF, and $237m on Jul 31, 2026 for Main Thematic Innovation ETF.

ARKK on its own →TMAT on its own →

At a glance

36.2%

ARKK in the S&P 500

50.3%

TMAT in the S&P 500

−3.7%

ARKK total return, 1 year

−3.1%

TMAT total return, 1 year

ARKK · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 64% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

36% of ARKK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.

TMAT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 50% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

50% of TMAT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 50% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ARKK costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ARKK vs TMAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	ARKK	TMAT
Return
Measure	ARKK	TMAT
Total return, 1 year	−3.7%	−3.1%
Drawdown
Measure	ARKK	TMAT
Below its all-time high	48.0%, high on Feb 12, 2021	15.9%, high on Jun 30, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	ARKK	TMAT
What it tracks	Broad innovation and megatrends	Broad innovation and megatrends
Against the S&P 500, 1 year	behind by 18.5 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 18.5 pts	behind by 18.1 pts
Cost and size
Measure	ARKK	TMAT
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.79%
Net assets, ARKK as of Nov 2, 2026 and TMAT as of Jul 31, 2026	$5.9bn	$237m
Holdings
Measure	ARKK	TMAT
Holdings in common	6%

Method

Risk and return

Feb 5, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026 · 299 weekly returns

ARKK TMAT

Return

Total return edge TMAT −45.2% +2.3%

Annualized edge TMAT −9.9% +0.4%

Price return edge TMAT −46.0% +1.8%

Risk

Volatility edge TMAT 43.4% 28.5%

Max drawdown edge TMAT −80.1% −58.5%

Downside capture 140.1% 137.1%

Beta 1.68 1.58

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge TMAT −0.11 0.04

Sortino edge TMAT −0.15 0.05

Treynor 0.102 0.006

Calmar edge TMAT −0.12 0.01

Against the benchmark

Alpha −2.8% a year −11.7% a year

Alpha t-stat −0.38 −1.72

Information ratio 0.19 −0.38

Tracking error 27.5% 18.4%

Each against its own benchmark: ARKK against VOO, Nov 7, 2014 to Oct 30, 2026; TMAT against ACWI, Feb 5, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Feb 2021 to Oct 2026, TMAT returned more: +2.3% to −45.2%. TMAT swung less: 28.5% to 43.4%. TMAT fell less at its worst: −58.5% to −80.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: ARKK vs TMAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	ARKK	TMAT	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	−45.2%	+2.3%	TMAT	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	−9.9%	+0.4%	TMAT	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	−46.0%	+1.8%	TMAT	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	43.4%	28.5%	TMAT	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	30.0%	20.2%	TMAT	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−80.1%	−58.5%	TMAT	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture	236.0%	171.0%		Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture	140.1%	137.1%		Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta	1.68	1.58	Not an edge	How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared	0.55	0.68	Not an edge	Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	−0.11	0.04	TMAT	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	−0.15	0.05	TMAT	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor	0.102	0.006		Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar	−0.12	0.01	TMAT	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
Benchmark	VOO	ACWI		The ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha	−2.8% a year	−11.7% a year	Not significant	Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat	−0.38	−1.72	Not an edge	How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range	−17.1% to +11.5%	−25.1% to +1.7%	Includes zero	The 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio	0.19	−0.38		Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error	27.5%	18.4%	Not an edge	How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 299 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, ARKK and TMAT hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 2, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

6% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ARKK TMAT

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.62% 2.06%

VERACYTE INC 1.22% 1.30%

CLOUDFLARE INC - CLASS A 1.04% 1.81%

BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.06% 0.97%

TERADYNE INC 0.70% 1.59%

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions Inc 1.14% 0.42%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in ARKK

TESLA INC 11.62%

TEMPUS AI INC-CL A 6.35%

SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 6.29%

CIRCLE INTERNET GROUP INC 4.60%

CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG 4.48%

OPENAI GROUP PBC SERIES C 4.25%

COINBASE GLOBAL INC -CLASS A 3.76%

SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A 3.15%

Only in TMAT

PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 4.46%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.23%

CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 2.77%

FORTINET INC 2.63%

CLEAR SECURE INC 2.43%

VICOR CORP 2.18%

HINGE HEALTH INC 2.09%

LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 2.06%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ARKK vs TMAT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	ARKK	TMAT	ARKK	TMAT
3 months	+5.5%	−9.4%	+5.6 pts vs VOO	−8.1 pts vs ACWI
6 months	+1.0%	−4.9%	−4.0 pts vs VOO	−7.5 pts vs ACWI
1 year	−3.7%	−3.1%	−18.5 pts vs VOO	−18.1 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+98.7%	+92.3%	+15.4 pts vs VOO	+14.7 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: ARKK Oct 2014 · TMAT Jan 2021	+336.0%	+7.5%	−31.3 pts vs VOO	−85.1 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ARKK ARK Innovation ETF · Holds 46 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 36% of its weight in S&P 500 companies TMAT Main Thematic Innovation ETF · Holds 87 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 50% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer ARK Main

Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends

In the S&P 500 36.2% 50.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 85.7% 91.6%

In the Nasdaq-100 39.8% 29.4%

Holdings 46 87

Top ten, share of the fund 50.4% 26.9%

Expense ratio 0.75% 0.79%

Fee for the differing part 0.88% 0.86%

Total return, 1 year −3.7% −3.1%

vs its benchmark −18.5 pts vs VOO −18.1 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −48.0% −15.9%

Net assets, ARKK as of Nov 2, 2026 and TMAT as of Jul 31, 2026 $5.9bn $237m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

6% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

ARKK

By weight, 36% of ARKK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 46 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 2, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −3.7% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 18.5 pts. It sits 48.0% below its all-time high of Feb 12, 2021.

TMAT

By weight, 50% of TMAT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 27% of the fund across 87 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −3.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index Net, so a holder was behind by 18.1 pts. It sits 15.9% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ARKK and TMAT hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ARKK or TMAT?: ARKK has 36% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TMAT has 50%, so TMAT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ARKK or TMAT?: ARKK charges 0.75% a year and TMAT charges 0.79%, so ARKK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ARKK vs GTEK ARKK vs FRWD ARKK vs FDTX ARKK vs ILDR TMAT vs XT TMAT vs TNXT TMAT vs XDAT TMAT vs QQQJ

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →ARKK on its own →TMAT on its own →ARKK holdings →TMAT dividend history →TMAT holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

ARKK filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ARKK prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ARK page for ARKK ↗

TMAT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TMAT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Main website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ARKK against TMAT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/arkk-vs-tmat

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.