Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MISL vs WR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MISL and WR hold 31% of their weight in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MISL and WRNet assets: $685m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF, and $932,169 on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi U.S. War Machine ETF.
66% of MISL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 34% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
68% of WR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 32% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
WR costs 0.25 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | MISL | WR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −2.3% | not published |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 19.1%, high on Jan 16, 2026 | 7.2%, high on Oct 30, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Defense | Defense |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 17.1 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 17.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $685m | $974,606 |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 31% | |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
May 15, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 24 weekly returnsFrom May 2026 to Oct 2026, WR returned more: +12.4% to −6.6%. WR fell less at its worst: −7.0% to −16.7%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MISL | WR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −6.6% | +12.4% | WR | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −6.6% | +12.4% | WR | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −16.7% | −7.0% | WR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 24 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MISL and WR hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
31% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MISL | WR | MISL | WR |
| 3 months | −10.2% | +2.8% | −10.1 pts vs VOO | not measured |
| 6 months | −7.5% | +6.4% | −12.5 pts vs VOO | not measured |
| 1 year | −2.3% | – | −17.1 pts vs VOO | – |
| 3 years | +79.3% | – | −4.0 pts vs VOO | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: MISL Oct 2022 · WR May 2026 | +103.7% | +6.4% | −8.3 pts vs VOO | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
31% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for WR.
MISL
By weight, 66% of MISL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 44 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 17.1 pts. It sits 19.1% below its all-time high of Jan 16, 2026.
WR
By weight, 68% of WR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 56 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on May 6, 2026 the fund returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 7.2% below its all-time high of Oct 30, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do MISL and WR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 31% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MISL against WR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/misl-vs-wr
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MISL against WR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/misl-vs-wr
[MISL against WR (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/misl-vs-wr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.