Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DUTY vs MISL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
DUTY and MISL hold 39% of their weight in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DUTY and MISLNet assets: $2.1m on Jun 30, 2026 for U.S. Defense ETF, and $685m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Indxx Aerospace & Defense ETF.
62% of DUTY's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 38% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
66% of MISL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 34% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
DUTY costs 0.15 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DUTY | MISL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −2.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 9.0%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 19.1%, high on Jan 16, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Defense | Defense |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 17.1 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 17.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, DUTY as of Jun 30, 2026 and MISL as of Nov 3, 2026 | $2.1m | $685m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 39% | |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DUTY and MISL hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
39% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DUTY | MISL | DUTY | MISL |
| 3 months | −2.5% | −10.2% | not measured | −10.1 pts vs VOO |
| 6 months | +13.4% | −7.5% | not measured | −12.5 pts vs VOO |
| 1 year | – | −2.3% | – | −17.1 pts vs VOO |
| 3 years | – | +79.3% | – | −4.0 pts vs VOO |
| Since launchNot the same days: DUTY Apr 2026 · MISL Oct 2022 | +7.2% | +103.7% | not measured | −8.3 pts vs VOO |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
39% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
DUTY
By weight, 62% of DUTY's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 8, 2026 the fund returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 9.0% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
MISL
By weight, 66% of MISL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 44 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 17.1 pts. It sits 19.1% below its all-time high of Jan 16, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do DUTY and MISL hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DUTY against MISL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/duty-vs-misl
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DUTY against MISL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/duty-vs-misl
[DUTY against MISL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/duty-vs-misl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.