Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

KROP vs MOO: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KROP returned +19.4% to MOO's +21.7%; 29% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KROP and MOO

Net assets: $18m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF, and $1.1bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Agribusiness ETF.

At a glance
28.9%
KROP in the S&P 500
34.4%
MOO in the S&P 500
+19.4%
KROP total return, 1 year
+21.7%
MOO total return, 1 year
KROP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 71% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
71% of its weight is outside the S&P 50029% of KROP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 71% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.29%71%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 75% of the fund · 31 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in71% of its weight is outside the S&P 50029% of KROP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 71% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.29%71%inoutside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

29% of KROP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 71% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

MOO · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 66% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
66% of its weight is outside the S&P 50034% of MOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 66% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.34%66%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 58% of the fund · 49 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 2, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in66% of its weight is outside the S&P 50034% of MOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 66% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.34%66%inoutside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

34% of MOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 66% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.

Pair scorecard

KROP costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.3 points; MOO is far larger, $1.1bn against $18m.

KROP vs MOO: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureKROPMOO
Return
Total return, 1 year+19.4%+21.7%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high49.5%, high on Aug 10, 202113.8%, high on Apr 20, 2022
Benchmark
What it tracksAgricultureAgriculture
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.56%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$18m$1.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common29%

Method

What they share

29%

By the books each fund has filed, KROP and MOO hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

29% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KROP MOO
DEERE & COMPANY 13.32% 8.45%
Nutrien Ltd. 12.06% 6.00%
KUBOTA CORPORATION 11.36% 4.83%
ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY. 3.85% 5.26%
CNH Industrial N.V. 4.82% 2.70%
AGCO CORPORATION 4.44% 1.77%
CORTEVA, INC. 11.77% 1.05%
FMC CORPORATION 3.46% 0.20%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KROP
Bayer Aktiengesellschaft 4.95%
LINDSAY CORPORATION 4.39%
Yuan Long Ping High-Tech Agriculture Co., Ltd. 4.36%
Hebei Yangyuan ZhiHui Beverage Co Ltd 3.94%
NUFARM LIMITED 3.00%
SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET, INC. 2.67%
CHENG DE LOLO Co.,Ltd. 2.50%
Oatly Group AB (publ) 1.62%
Only in MOO
Bayer Ag 8.59%
Zoetis Inc 6.69%
Vylor Inc 6.43%
Cf Industries Holdings Inc 4.09%
Tyson Foods Inc 4.08%
Mowi Asa 3.57%
Bunge Global Sa 2.90%
Toro Co 2.70%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: KROP vs MOO: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowKROPMOO
3 months−0.9%+3.1%
6 months−2.5%−0.6%
1 year+19.4%+21.7%
3 years+19.0%+21.6%
Since launchNot the same days: KROP Jul 2021 · MOO Sep 2007−48.8%+182.2%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF · Holds 31 stocks in agriculture, 29% of its weight in S&P 500 companies MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF · Holds 49 stocks in agriculture, 34% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Agriculture Agriculture
In the S&P 500 28.9% 34.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.6% 99.5%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 31 49
Top ten, share of the fund 75.4% 58.1%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.56%
Fee for the differing part 0.50% 0.56%
Total return, 1 year +19.4% +21.7%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −49.5% −13.8%
Net assets, KROP as of Oct 12, 2026 and MOO as of Nov 3, 2026 $18m $1.1bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

29% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

MOO flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KROP

By weight, 29% of KROP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 31 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 49.5% below its all-time high of Aug 10, 2021.

MOO

By weight, 34% of MOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. It sits 13.8% below its all-time high of Apr 20, 2022.

Questions people ask

Do KROP and MOO hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, KROP or MOO?
KROP has 29% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MOO has 34%, so KROP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, KROP or MOO?
KROP charges 0.50% a year and MOO charges 0.56%, so KROP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KROP against MOO, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/krop-vs-moo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.