Data as of .
KROP vs MOO: which is really different?
KROP and MOO hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and KROP returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: KROP scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
42% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KROP and MOO hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KROP | MOO |
|---|---|---|
| DEERE & CO | 13.99% | 8.84% |
| CORTEVA INC | 11.24% | 7.91% |
| NUTRIEN LTD | 12.36% | 7.12% |
| KUBOTA CORP | 10.85% | 4.68% |
| ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO | 4.06% | 5.38% |
| CNH INDUSTRIAL NV | 5.50% | 2.86% |
| AGCO CORP | 4.52% | 1.77% |
| FMC CORP | 3.04% | 0.32% |
| Only in KROP | Only in MOO |
|---|---|
| BAYER AG-REG 4.81% | Bayer Ag 8.71% |
| LINDSAY CORP 4.41% | Cf Industries Holdings Inc 4.98% |
| YUAN LONGPING HIGH-TECH AG-A 4.35% | Zoetis Inc 4.87% |
| HEBEI YANGYUAN ZHIHUI BEVE-A 4.12% | Tyson Foods Inc 3.66% |
| NUFARM LTD 3.07% | Bunge Global Sa 3.46% |
| CHENG DE LOLO CO LTD-A 2.50% | Mowi Asa 2.93% |
| SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET INC 2.31% | Darling Ingredients Inc 2.73% |
| TITAN MACHINERY INC 1.87% | Wilmar International Ltd 2.44% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 17, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KROP | MOO | KROP | MOO | KROP | MOO | |
| 3 months | +8.8% | +10.0% | +6.5 pts | +7.7 pts | +11.2 pts | +12.5 pts |
| 6 months | +12.2% | +5.5% | −5.9 pts | −12.5 pts | −12.1 pts | −18.7 pts |
| 1 year | +19.7% | +17.0% | +3.2 pts | +0.4 pts | −2.0 pts | −4.8 pts |
| 3 years | +16.8% | +13.1% | −61.6 pts | −65.3 pts | −81.4 pts | −85.1 pts |
| Since launch | −45.5% | +157.3% | −132.8 pts | −646.3 pts | −150.2 pts | −1533.0 pts |
| KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF Holds 37 stocks in food and agriculture, 29% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF Holds 49 stocks in food and agriculture, 41% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | VanEck |
| Theme | Food and agriculture | Food and agriculture |
| In the S&P 500 | 29.3% | 40.9% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.6% | 99.5% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 37 | 49 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 76.1% | 59.6% |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.56% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.50% | 0.56% |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.7% | +17.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +3.2 pts | +0.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −2.0 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Below its high | −46.2% | −12.8% |
| Net assets | $19m | $1.3bn |
KROP in plain words
By weight, 29% of KROP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +19.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 3.2 pts. It sits 46.2% below its all-time high of Aug 10, 2021.
MOO in plain words
By weight, 41% of MOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 17, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 12.8% below its all-time high of Apr 20, 2022.
Questions people ask
- Do KROP and MOO hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KROP or MOO?
- KROP has 29% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MOO has 41%, so KROP differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, KROP or MOO?
- KROP charges 0.50% a year and MOO charges 0.56%, so KROP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KROP against MOO, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/krop-vs-moo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.