Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FTAG vs MOO: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTAG returned +17.8% to MOO's +21.7%; 52% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FTAG and MOO
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $14m for First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF and $1.1bn for VanEck Agribusiness ETF.
21% of FTAG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
34% of MOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 66% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.
Pair scorecard
MOO costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.9 points; MOO is far larger, $1.1bn against $14m.
| Measure | FTAG | MOO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +17.8% | +21.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 78.2%, high on Jan 3, 2011 | 13.8%, high on Apr 20, 2022 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Agriculture | Agriculture |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.70% | 0.56% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $14m | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 52% | |
Risk and return
Mar 19, 2010 to Oct 30, 2026 · 867 weekly returnsFrom Mar 2010 to Oct 2026, MOO returned more: +151.1% to −75.0%. MOO swung less: 17.9% to 24.2%. MOO fell less at its worst: −37.0% to −90.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FTAG | MOO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −75.0% | +151.1% | MOO | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | −8.0% | +5.7% | MOO | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −81.1% | +84.4% | MOO | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 24.2% | 17.9% | MOO | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 18.1% | 12.7% | MOO | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −90.5% | −37.0% | MOO | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.29 | 0.31 | MOO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.38 | 0.44 | MOO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | −0.09 | 0.15 | MOO | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 867 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FTAG and MOO hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
52% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | ||
|---|---|---|
| Window | FTAG | MOO |
| 3 months | 0.0% | +3.1% |
| 6 months | −2.1% | −0.6% |
| 1 year | +17.8% | +21.7% |
| 3 years | +24.2% | +21.6% |
| Since launchNot the same days: FTAG Mar 2010 · MOO Sep 2007 | −74.5% | +182.2% |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
52% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FTAG
By weight, 21% of FTAG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 54 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 78.2% below its all-time high of Jan 3, 2011.
MOO
By weight, 34% of MOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. It sits 13.8% below its all-time high of Apr 20, 2022.
Questions people ask
- Do FTAG and MOO hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 52% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTAG against MOO, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ftag-vs-moo
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FTAG against MOO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ftag-vs-moo
[FTAG against MOO (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ftag-vs-moo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.