Data as of .
MOO vs PDBA: which is really different?
MOO and PDBA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MOO returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: PDBA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MOO and PDBA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MOO | Only in PDBA |
|---|---|
| Deere & Co 8.84% | Invesco Premier US Government Money Port 81.50% |
| Bayer Ag 8.71% | POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 18.50% |
| Corteva Inc 7.91% | |
| Nutrien Ltd 7.12% | |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 5.38% | |
| Cf Industries Holdings Inc 4.98% | |
| Zoetis Inc 4.87% | |
| Kubota Corp 4.68% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 17, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | PDBA | MOO | PDBA | MOO | PDBA | |
| 3 months | +10.0% | +5.7% | +7.7 pts | +3.5 pts | +12.5 pts | +8.2 pts |
| 6 months | +5.5% | +4.9% | −12.5 pts | −13.2 pts | −18.7 pts | −19.4 pts |
| 1 year | +17.0% | +7.5% | +0.4 pts | −9.1 pts | −4.8 pts | −14.3 pts |
| 3 years | +13.1% | +43.1% | −65.3 pts | −35.3 pts | −85.1 pts | −55.0 pts |
| Since launch | +157.3% | +56.0% | −646.3 pts | −38.8 pts | −1533.0 pts | −78.7 pts |
| MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF Holds 49 stocks in food and agriculture, 41% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | PDBA Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF Holds 2 stocks in food and agriculture, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VanEck | Invesco |
| Theme | Food and agriculture | Food and agriculture |
| In the S&P 500 | 40.9% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.5% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 49 | 2 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 59.6% | 100.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 0.59% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.56% | 0.59% |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +7.5% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +0.4 pts | −9.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −4.8 pts | −14.3 pts |
| Below its high | −12.8% | −4.6% |
| Net assets | $1.3bn | $506m |
MOO in plain words
By weight, 41% of MOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 17, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 12.8% below its all-time high of Apr 20, 2022.
PDBA in plain words
By weight, 0% of PDBA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 2 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 19, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +7.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do MOO and PDBA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, MOO or PDBA?
- MOO has 41% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PDBA has 0%, so PDBA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, MOO or PDBA?
- MOO charges 0.56% a year and PDBA charges 0.59%, so MOO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOO against PDBA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/moo-vs-pdba Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.