Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
MOO vs PDBA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MOO returned +21.7% to PDBA's +3.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about MOO and PDBA
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $1.1bn for VanEck Agribusiness ETF and $295m for Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.
34% of MOO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 66% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.
PDBA holds 1 position, 20% of its net assets. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
MOO costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.7 points; MOO is 3.7 times larger.
| Measure | MOO | PDBA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.7% | +3.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 13.8%, high on Apr 20, 2022 | 10.3%, high on Sep 1, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Agriculture | Agriculture |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.56% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.1bn | $295m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
Sep 2, 2022 to Oct 30, 2026 · 217 weekly returnsFrom Sep 2022 to Oct 2026, PDBA returned more: +50.8% to +1.8%. PDBA swung less: 13.2% to 16.2%. PDBA fell less at its worst: −11.9% to −27.5%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | MOO | PDBA | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +1.8% | +50.8% | PDBA | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +0.4% | +10.3% | PDBA | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −8.7% | +20.0% | PDBA | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.2% | 13.2% | PDBA | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.0% | 9.2% | PDBA | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −27.5% | −11.9% | PDBA | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.17 | 0.47 | PDBA | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.23 | 0.67 | PDBA | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.02 | 0.87 | PDBA | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 217 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, MOO and PDBA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | ||
|---|---|---|
| Window | MOO | PDBA |
| 3 months | +3.1% | −4.2% |
| 6 months | −0.6% | −5.6% |
| 1 year | +21.7% | +3.0% |
| 3 years | +21.6% | +33.8% |
| Since launchNot the same days: MOO Sep 2007 · PDBA Aug 2022 | +182.2% | +46.7% |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
MOO
By weight, 34% of MOO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested. It sits 13.8% below its all-time high of Apr 20, 2022.
PDBA
By weight, 0% of PDBA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 20% of the fund across 1 position, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 10.3% below its all-time high of Sep 1, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do MOO and PDBA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MOO against PDBA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/moo-vs-pdba
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). MOO against PDBA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/moo-vs-pdba
[MOO against PDBA (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/moo-vs-pdba)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.