Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
KGRN vs QCLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KGRN returned −26.1% to QCLN's +1.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about KGRN and QCLN
Net assets: $44m on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF, and $489m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund.
0% of KGRN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
34% of QCLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
QCLN costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 27.7 points; QCLN is 11.4 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | KGRN | QCLN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −26.1% | +1.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 57.8%, high on Feb 16, 2021 | 47.7%, high on Feb 9, 2021 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Clean energy | Clean energy |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 13.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $43m | $489m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, KGRN and QCLN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | KGRN | QCLN | KGRN | QCLN |
| 3 months | −10.1% | −11.9% | not measured | −11.6 pts vs IWV |
| 6 months | −24.8% | −25.1% | not measured | −30.0 pts vs IWV |
| 1 year | −26.1% | +1.6% | not measured | −13.2 pts vs IWV |
| 3 years | −8.0% | +27.3% | not measured | −53.7 pts vs IWV |
| Since launchNot the same days: KGRN Oct 2017 · QCLN Feb 2007 | −1.9% | +149.5% | not measured | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
KGRN
By weight, 0% of KGRN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −26.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 57.8% below its all-time high of Feb 16, 2021.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts.
By weight, 34% of QCLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. It sits 47.7% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do KGRN and QCLN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KGRN against QCLN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kgrn-vs-qcln
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). KGRN against QCLN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kgrn-vs-qcln
[KGRN against QCLN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kgrn-vs-qcln)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.