Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CTEC vs QCLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CTEC returned −9.3% to QCLN's +1.6%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CTEC and QCLNNet assets: $23m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X ClimateTech ETF, and $489m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund.
6% of CTEC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
34% of QCLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
CTEC costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.9 points; QCLN is far larger, $525m against $23m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CTEC | QCLN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −9.3% | +1.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 62.8%, high on Feb 9, 2021 | 47.7%, high on Feb 9, 2021 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Clean energy | Clean energy |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 13.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $23m | $525m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CTEC and QCLN hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
22% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CTEC | QCLN | CTEC | QCLN |
| 3 months | −9.3% | −11.9% | not measured | −11.6 pts vs IWV |
| 6 months | −26.4% | −25.1% | not measured | −30.0 pts vs IWV |
| 1 year | −9.3% | +1.6% | not measured | −13.2 pts vs IWV |
| 3 years | +11.5% | +27.3% | not measured | −53.7 pts vs IWV |
| Since launchNot the same days: CTEC Oct 2020 · QCLN Feb 2007 | −30.0% | +149.5% | not measured | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
22% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
CTEC
By weight, 6% of CTEC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −9.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 62.8% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts.
By weight, 34% of QCLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. It sits 47.7% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do CTEC and QCLN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CTEC against QCLN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ctec-vs-qcln
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CTEC against QCLN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ctec-vs-qcln
[CTEC against QCLN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ctec-vs-qcln)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.