Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
KGRN vs TAN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KGRN returned −26.1% to TAN's −4.5%; 4% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about KGRN and TAN
Net assets: $44m on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF, and $937m on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco Solar ETF.
0% of KGRN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
10% of TAN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 90% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
TAN costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.6 points; TAN is far larger, $937m against $43m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | KGRN | TAN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −26.1% | −4.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 57.8%, high on Feb 16, 2021 | 79.0%, high on May 16, 2008 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Clean energy | Clean energy |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 19.5 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.70% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $43m | $937m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 4% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, KGRN and TAN hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
4% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | KGRN | TAN | KGRN | TAN |
| 3 months | −10.1% | −10.7% | not measured | −9.4 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −24.8% | −24.3% | not measured | −26.9 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | −26.1% | −4.5% | not measured | −19.5 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | −8.0% | +3.0% | not measured | −74.6 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: KGRN Oct 2017 · TAN Apr 2008 | −1.9% | −76.1% | not measured | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
KGRN
By weight, 0% of KGRN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −26.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 57.8% below its all-time high of Feb 16, 2021.
TAN
By weight, 10% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −4.5% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 19.5 pts. It sits 79.0% below its all-time high of May 16, 2008.
Questions people ask
- Do KGRN and TAN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KGRN against TAN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kgrn-vs-tan
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). KGRN against TAN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kgrn-vs-tan
[KGRN against TAN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kgrn-vs-tan)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.