Data as of .
KGRN vs TAN: which is really different?
KGRN and TAN hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and TAN returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: KGRN scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KGRN and TAN hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KGRN | TAN |
|---|---|---|
| XINYI SOLAR HOLDINGS LTD | 3.01% | 2.78% |
| JINKOSOLAR HOLDING CO-ADR | 0.75% | 0.97% |
| XINYI ENERGY HOLDINGS LTD | 0.53% | 0.90% |
| Only in KGRN | Only in TAN |
|---|---|
| CGN POWER CO LTD-H 10.44% | First Solar Inc 9.81% |
| CHINA YANGTZE POWER CO LTD-A 9.71% | Nextpower Inc 8.84% |
| BYD CO LTD-H 8.07% | Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd 8.19% |
| CHINA NATIONAL NUCLEAR POW-A 4.96% | Enphase Energy Inc 6.37% |
| EB ENVIRONMENT 4.66% | Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources L 4.68% |
| CHINA LONGYUAN POWER GROUP-H 4.23% | HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital In 4.39% |
| CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHN-A 3.94% | GCL Technology Holdings Ltd 4.35% |
| SUNGROW POWER SUPPLY CO LT-A 3.84% | Sunrun Inc 3.86% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGRN | TAN | KGRN | TAN | KGRN | TAN | |
| 3 months | −10.9% | −24.6% | −13.2 pts | −26.9 pts | −8.5 pts | −22.1 pts |
| 6 months | −22.8% | −17.2% | −40.8 pts | −35.2 pts | −47.0 pts | −41.5 pts |
| 1 year | −28.1% | +6.7% | −44.6 pts | −9.9 pts | −49.9 pts | −15.1 pts |
| 3 years | −10.9% | −15.9% | −89.3 pts | −94.3 pts | −109.1 pts | −114.0 pts |
| Since launch | −1.8% | −41.6% | −245.0 pts | −845.2 pts | −417.3 pts | −1731.9 pts |
| KGRN KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF Holds 51 stocks in clean energy, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | TAN Invesco Solar ETF Holds 45 stocks in clean energy, 10% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | Invesco |
| Theme | Clean energy | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 9.8% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 51 | 45 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 57.1% | 58.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.70% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.79% | 0.70% |
| Total return, 1 year | −28.1% | +6.7% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −44.6 pts | −9.9 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −49.9 pts | −15.1 pts |
| Below its high | −57.7% | −62.3% |
| Net assets | $47m | $953m |
KGRN in plain words
By weight, 0% of KGRN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 51 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −28.1% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 44.6 pts. It sits 57.7% below its all-time high of Feb 16, 2021.
TAN in plain words
By weight, 10% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 19, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +6.7% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. It sits 62.3% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do KGRN and TAN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, KGRN or TAN?
- KGRN has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TAN has 10%, so KGRN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, KGRN or TAN?
- KGRN charges 0.79% a year and TAN charges 0.70%, so TAN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KGRN against TAN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kgrn-vs-tan Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.