Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACES vs QCLN: which is really different?

ACES and QCLN hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and QCLN returned more over the year.

ALPS Clean Energy ETF and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund.

14.7%ACES in the S&P 500
30.9%QCLN in the S&P 500
−5.9%ACES total return, 1 year
+16.1%QCLN total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: ACES scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

ACES 51.7QCLN 480.1, the lowest in this set91.8, the highest

A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ACES85% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
15%85%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 51% of the fund · 37 holdings filed May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 4% in15%85%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 51% of the fund
QCLN69% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
31%69%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 60% of the fund · 58 holdings filed Sep 18, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 16% in31%69%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 60% of the fund

38% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACES and QCLN hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ACES and QCLN both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingACESQCLN
Tesla Inc4.24%8.08%
First Solar Inc6.25%3.96%
Brookfield Renewable Partners Lp4.68%3.08%
Ormat Technologies Inc4.84%2.06%
Enphase Energy Inc6.53%1.57%
Itron Inc3.48%1.36%
Plug Power Inc6.04%1.00%
Sunrun Inc4.18%0.71%
Eos Energy Enterprises Inc3.10%0.50%
Amprius Technologies Inc2.43%0.48%
T1 Energy Inc1.95%0.42%
Willdan Group Inc1.43%0.42%
Only in each
Only in ACESOnly in QCLN
Nextpower Inc 5.93%Bloom Energy Corporation (Class A) 10.51%
Ha Sustainable Infrastructure Capital In 4.40%Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 7.84%
Northland Power Inc 4.20%ON Semiconductor Corporation 7.71%
Albemarle Corp 4.17%Rivian Automotive, Inc. (Class A) 6.89%
Rivian Automotive Inc 4.08%Nextpower Inc. (Class A) 4.00%
Clearway Energy Inc 3.79%Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 3.61%
Boralex Inc 3.00%Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. 3.60%
American Superconductor Corp 2.58%Albemarle Corporation 3.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACES and QCLN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
ACESQCLNACESQCLNACESQCLN
3 months−21.4%−25.6%−23.6 pts−27.8 pts−18.9 pts−23.1 pts
6 months−10.0%+4.5%−28.0 pts−13.6 pts−34.2 pts−19.8 pts
1 year−5.9%+16.1%−22.4 pts−0.5 pts−27.6 pts−5.7 pts
3 years−25.4%+7.8%−103.8 pts−70.6 pts−123.6 pts−90.4 pts
Since launch+25.2%+222.2%−192.9 pts−581.4 pts−317.7 pts−1468.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACES and QCLN on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
Holds 37 stocks in clean energy, 15% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
QCLN
First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
Holds 58 stocks in clean energy, 31% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssuerALPSFirst Trust
ThemeClean energyClean energy
In the S&P 50014.7%30.9%
Active share vs the S&P 50098.1%97.9%
In the Nasdaq-1004.2%15.9%
Holdings3758
Top ten, share of the fund51.3%59.5%
Expense ratio0.55%0.59%
Fee for the differing part0.56%0.60%
Total return, 1 year−5.9%+16.1%
vs the S&P 500−22.4 pts−0.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−27.6 pts−5.7 pts
Below its high−69.6%−44.6%
Net assets$145m$546m

ACES in plain words

By weight, 15% of ACES's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 51% of the fund across 37 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −5.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.4 pts. It sits 69.6% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.

QCLN in plain words

By weight, 31% of QCLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 44.6% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do ACES and QCLN hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 38% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ACES or QCLN?
ACES has 15% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QCLN has 31%, so ACES differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ACES or QCLN?
ACES charges 0.55% a year and QCLN charges 0.59%, so ACES is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACES against QCLN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACES against QCLN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aces-vs-qcln Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources