Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

ICLN vs QCLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ICLN returned −2.3% to QCLN's +1.6%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ICLN and QCLN

Net assets: $2.1bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, and $489m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund.

At a glance
8.8%
ICLN in the S&P 500
33.5%
QCLN in the S&P 500
−2.3%
ICLN total return, 1 year
+1.6%
QCLN total return, 1 year
ICLN · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of ICLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.9%91%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 52% of the fund · 106 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of ICLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.9%91%9% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

9% of ICLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

QCLN · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 67% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
67% of its weight is outside the S&P 50034% of QCLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.34%67%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 61% of the fund · 57 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 18% in67% of its weight is outside the S&P 50034% of QCLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.34%67%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 18% in

34% of QCLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ICLN costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.9 points; ICLN is 4.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ICLN vs QCLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureICLNQCLN
Return
Total return, 1 year−2.3%+1.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high54.7%, high on Jun 25, 200847.7%, high on Feb 9, 2021
Against its benchmark
What it tracksClean energyClean energy
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 13.2 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.38%0.59%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$2.0bn$489m
Holdings
Holdings in common25%

Method

Risk and return

Jul 3, 2008 to Oct 30, 2026 · 956 weekly returns
ICLN QCLN
Return
Total return edge QCLN −53.6% +108.8%
Annualized edge QCLN −4.1% +4.1%
Price return edge QCLN −67.8% +89.6%
Risk
Volatility edge ICLN (slight) 32.2% 34.7%
Max drawdown edge QCLN −86.1% −69.6%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QCLN −0.01 0.25
Sortino edge QCLN −0.02 0.35
Calmar edge QCLN −0.05 0.06
Reading

From Jul 2008 to Oct 2026, QCLN returned more: +108.8% to −53.6%. ICLN swung slightly less: 32.2% to 34.7%. QCLN fell less at its worst: −69.6% to −86.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ICLN vs QCLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureICLNQCLNEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return−53.6%+108.8%QCLNPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized−4.1%+4.1%QCLNTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−67.8%+89.6%QCLNPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility32.2%34.7%ICLN (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation23.2%24.4%ICLN (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−86.1%−69.6%QCLNDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe−0.010.25QCLNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino−0.020.35QCLNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar−0.050.06QCLNAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 956 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

25%

By the books each fund has filed, ICLN and QCLN hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ICLN QCLN
BLOOM ENERGY CLASS A 6.23% 8.90%
NEXTPOWER INC 9.29% 5.02%
FIRST SOLAR 8.75% 3.95%
ORMAT TECH INC 3.08% 2.09%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY 1.96% 3.27%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC CLASS C 2.21% 1.51%
ENPHASE ENERGY 2.85% 1.45%
SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES 1.44% 0.73%
PLUG POWER 1.40% 0.71%
SHOALS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP CLASS A 1.01% 0.52%
RENEW ENERGY GLOBAL PLC CLASS A 0.35% 0.61%
T1 ENERGY 0.44% 0.30%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ICLN
IBERDROLA 6.71%
CHINA YANGTZE POWER LTD A 5.59%
AXIA ENERGIA SA 3.84%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS 3.32%
CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER INC 2.70%
EDP ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL 2.26%
EQUATORIAL SA 1.93%
SUZLON ENERGY 1.78%
Only in QCLN
Tesla, Inc. 9.29%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 8.99%
ON Semiconductor Corporation 8.41%
Rivian Automotive, Inc. (Class A) 6.42%
Acuity Inc. 3.58%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 3.45%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP 3.29%
Albemarle Corporation 2.87%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ICLN vs QCLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowICLNQCLNICLNQCLN
3 months−8.3%−11.9%not measured−11.6 pts vs IWV
6 months−21.9%−25.1%not measured−30.0 pts vs IWV
1 year−2.3%+1.6%not measured−13.2 pts vs IWV
3 years+27.1%+27.3%not measured−53.7 pts vs IWV
Since launchNot the same days: ICLN Jun 2008 · QCLN Feb 2007−54.7%+149.5%not measurednot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF · Holds 106 stocks in clean energy, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies QCLN First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund · Holds 57 stocks in clean energy, 34% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Clean energy Clean energy
In the S&P 500 8.8% 33.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 97.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 18.3%
Holdings 106 57
Top ten, share of the fund 52.4% 61.3%
Expense ratio 0.38% 0.59%
Fee for the differing part 0.38% 0.60%
Total return, 1 year −2.3% +1.6%
vs its benchmark not measured −13.2 pts vs IWV
Below its high −54.7% −47.7%
Net assets, ICLN as of Nov 4, 2026 and QCLN as of Nov 3, 2026 $2.1bn $489m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

25% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

ICLN and QCLN flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ICLN

By weight, 9% of ICLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 106 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 54.7% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2008.

QCLN

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts.

By weight, 34% of QCLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. It sits 47.7% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do ICLN and QCLN hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ICLN or QCLN?
ICLN has 9% of its weight in S&P 500 names and QCLN has 34%, so ICLN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ICLN or QCLN?
ICLN charges 0.38% a year and QCLN charges 0.59%, so ICLN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ICLN against QCLN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/icln-vs-qcln

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.