Do QCLN and TAN hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, QCLN or TAN?

QCLN has 34% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TAN has 10%, so TAN differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, QCLN or TAN?

QCLN charges 0.59% a year and TAN charges 0.70%, so QCLN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

QCLN vs TAN: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QCLN returned +1.6% to TAN's −4.5%; 20% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QCLN and TAN

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $489m for First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund and $937m for Invesco Solar ETF.

QCLN on its own →TAN on its own →

At a glance

33.5%

QCLN in the S&P 500

9.7%

TAN in the S&P 500

+1.6%

QCLN total return, 1 year

−4.5%

TAN total return, 1 year

QCLN · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 67% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

34% of QCLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

TAN · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 90% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

10% of TAN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 90% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

QCLN costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.1 points; TAN is 1.9 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

QCLN vs TAN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	QCLN	TAN
Return
Measure	QCLN	TAN
Total return, 1 year	+1.6%	−4.5%
Drawdown
Measure	QCLN	TAN
Below its all-time high	47.7%, high on Feb 9, 2021	79.0%, high on May 16, 2008
Against its benchmark
Measure	QCLN	TAN
What it tracks	Clean energy	Clean energy
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 13.2 pts	behind by 19.5 pts
Cost and size
Measure	QCLN	TAN
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.70%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$489m	$937m
Holdings
Measure	QCLN	TAN
Holdings in common	20%

Method

Risk and return

Apr 25, 2008 to Oct 30, 2026 · 966 weekly returns

QCLN TAN

Return

Total return edge QCLN +87.6% −79.4%

Annualized edge QCLN +3.4% −8.1%

Price return edge QCLN +70.3% −84.8%

Risk

Volatility edge QCLN 34.7% 44.6%

Max drawdown edge QCLN −70.2% −95.3%

Downside capture 127.5% 131.7%

Beta 1.50 1.63

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge QCLN 0.23 0.00

Sortino edge QCLN 0.33 0.00

Treynor 0.057 0.000

Calmar edge QCLN 0.05 −0.09

Against the benchmark

Alpha −6.4% a year −13.0% a year

Alpha t-stat −1.36 −1.69

Information ratio −0.06 −0.23

Tracking error 22.8% 34.9%

Each against its own benchmark: QCLN against IWV, Feb 23, 2007 to Oct 30, 2026; TAN against ACWI, Apr 25, 2008 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Apr 2008 to Oct 2026, QCLN returned more: +87.6% to −79.4%. QCLN swung less: 34.7% to 44.6%. QCLN fell less at its worst: −70.2% to −95.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: QCLN vs TAN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	QCLN	TAN	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+87.6%	−79.4%	QCLN	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+3.4%	−8.1%	QCLN	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+70.3%	−84.8%	QCLN	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	34.7%	44.6%	QCLN	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	24.4%	31.3%	QCLN	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−70.2%	−95.3%	QCLN	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture	173.8%	160.4%		Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture	127.5%	131.7%		Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta	1.50	1.63	Not an edge	How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared	0.63	0.45	Not an edge	Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.23	0.00	QCLN	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.33	0.00	QCLN	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor	0.057	0.000		Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar	0.05	−0.09	QCLN	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
Benchmark	IWV	ACWI		The ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha	−6.4% a year	−13.0% a year	Not significant	Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat	−1.36	−1.69	Not an edge	How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range	−15.7% to +2.9%	−28.0% to +2.0%	Includes zero	The 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio	−0.06	−0.23		Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error	22.8%	34.9%	Not an edge	How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 966 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

20%

By the books each fund has filed, QCLN and TAN hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

20% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first QCLN TAN

Nextpower Inc. (Class A) 5.02% 12.58%

First Solar, Inc. 3.95% 9.66%

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. 3.27% 7.63%

HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. 1.78% 5.20%

Clearway Energy, Inc. (Class C) 1.51% 4.49%

Enphase Energy, Inc. 1.45% 6.69%

Sunrun Inc. 0.76% 4.27%

SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 0.73% 3.96%

Renew Energy Global Plc (Class A) 0.61% 1.32%

Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (Class A) 0.52% 3.12%

T1 Energy Inc. 0.30% 1.38%

Array Technologies, Inc. 0.26% 1.80%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in QCLN

Tesla, Inc. 9.29%

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 8.99%

Bloom Energy Corporation (Class A) 8.90%

ON Semiconductor Corporation 8.41%

Rivian Automotive, Inc. (Class A) 6.42%

Acuity Inc. 3.58%

Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 3.45%

Brookfield Renewable Partners LP 3.29%

Only in TAN

Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd 4.88%

GCL Technology Holdings Ltd 3.71%

Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente SA 3.18%

Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd 2.65%

OY Nofar Energy Ltd 2.54%

SMA Solar Technology AG 2.07%

Energix-Renewable Energies Ltd 2.05%

United Renewable Energy Co Ltd 1.92%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: QCLN vs TAN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	QCLN	TAN	QCLN	TAN
3 months	−11.9%	−10.7%	−11.6 pts vs IWV	−9.4 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−25.1%	−24.3%	−30.0 pts vs IWV	−26.9 pts vs ACWI
1 year	+1.6%	−4.5%	−13.2 pts vs IWV	−19.5 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+27.3%	+3.0%	−53.7 pts vs IWV	−74.6 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: QCLN Feb 2007 · TAN Apr 2008	+149.5%	−76.1%	not measured	not measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

QCLN First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund · Holds 57 stocks in clean energy, 34% of its weight in S&P 500 companies TAN Invesco Solar ETF · Holds 37 stocks in clean energy, 10% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer First Trust Invesco

Theme Clean energy Clean energy

In the S&P 500 33.5% 9.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 97.9% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 18.3% 0.0%

Holdings 57 37

Top ten, share of the fund 61.3% 63.1%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.70%

Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.70%

Total return, 1 year +1.6% −4.5%

vs its benchmark −13.2 pts vs IWV −19.5 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −47.7% −79.0%

Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $489m $937m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

20% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

QCLN

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts.

By weight, 34% of QCLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 57 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. It sits 47.7% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.

TAN

By weight, 10% of TAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 37 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −4.5% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 19.5 pts. It sits 79.0% below its all-time high of May 16, 2008.

Questions people ask

Do QCLN and TAN hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, QCLN or TAN?: QCLN has 34% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TAN has 10%, so TAN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, QCLN or TAN?: QCLN charges 0.59% a year and TAN charges 0.70%, so QCLN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

QCLN vs ICLN QCLN vs SMOG QCLN vs VCLN QCLN vs PBW TAN vs ICLN TAN vs HYDR TAN vs CCSO TAN vs CTEC

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →QCLN on its own →TAN on its own →QCLN dividend history →QCLN holdings →TAN dividend history →TAN holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

QCLN filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

QCLN prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

First Trust page for QCLN ↗

TAN filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

TAN prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Invesco page for TAN ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QCLN against TAN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/qcln-vs-tan

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.