Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ICLN vs PBW: which is really different?

ICLN and PBW hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and ICLN returned more over the year.

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF.

7.7%ICLN in the S&P 500
7.7%PBW in the S&P 500
+18.0%ICLN total return, 1 year
+11.1%PBW total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: ICLN scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

ICLN 91.8PBW 480.1, the lowest in this set91.8, the highest

A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ICLN92% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
8%92%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 52% of the fund · 138 holdings filed Sep 17, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in8%92%8% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 52% of the fund
PBW92% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
8%92%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 21% of the fund · 74 holdings filed Sep 19, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 3% in8%92%8% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 21% of the fund

12% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ICLN and PBW hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions ICLN and PBW both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingICLNPBW
FIRST SOLAR7.58%1.52%
BLOOM ENERGY CLASS A9.06%1.50%
PLUG POWER2.74%1.46%
ENPHASE ENERGY4.29%1.29%
NEXTPOWER INC6.36%1.27%
SHOALS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP CLASS A1.19%1.32%
SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES1.99%1.17%
T1 ENERGY0.82%0.82%
ARRAY TECHNOLOGIES INC0.56%0.97%
CANADIAN SOLAR0.50%1.46%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE SUBORDINATE V0.47%1.45%
REX AMERICAN RESOURCES0.37%1.91%
Only in each
Only in ICLNOnly in PBW
CHINA YANGTZE POWER LTD A 7.78%Beta Technologies Inc 2.59%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS 4.33%Darling Ingredients Inc 2.39%
EQUATORIAL SA 3.36%Cadeler A/S 2.29%
EDP ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL 2.93%Gevo Inc 2.15%
CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER INC 2.72%Itron Inc 2.10%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY 1.98%OPAL Fuels Inc 2.04%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC CLASS C 1.89%Gentherm Inc 2.01%
SUZLON ENERGY 1.85%Preformed Line Products Co 1.95%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ICLN and PBW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
ICLNPBWICLNPBWICLNPBW
3 months−16.8%−25.8%−19.0 pts−28.1 pts−14.3 pts−23.4 pts
6 months−2.5%−0.1%−20.5 pts−18.1 pts−26.8 pts−24.3 pts
1 year+18.0%+11.1%+1.4 pts−5.5 pts−3.8 pts−10.7 pts
3 years+18.6%−4.3%−59.8 pts−82.7 pts−79.5 pts−102.5 pts
Since launch+9.3%−25.2%−794.3 pts−828.8 pts−1681.0 pts−1715.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ICLN and PBW on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Holds 138 stocks in clean energy, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
PBW
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Holds 74 stocks in clean energy, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssueriSharesInvesco
ThemeClean energyClean energy
In the S&P 5007.7%7.7%
Active share vs the S&P 500100.0%97.9%
In the Nasdaq-1000.0%3.2%
Holdings13874
Top ten, share of the fund51.9%21.3%
Expense ratio0.38%0.63%
Fee for the differing part0.38%0.64%
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+11.1%
vs the S&P 500+1.4 pts−5.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−3.8 pts−10.7 pts
Below its high−43.5%−74.5%
Net assets$2.1bn$363m

ICLN in plain words

By weight, 8% of ICLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 138 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. It sits 43.5% below its all-time high of Jan 7, 2021.

PBW in plain words

By weight, 8% of PBW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 21% of the fund across 74 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 19, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +11.1% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.5 pts. It sits 74.5% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do ICLN and PBW hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ICLN or PBW?
ICLN has 8% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PBW has 8%, so ICLN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ICLN or PBW?
ICLN charges 0.38% a year and PBW charges 0.63%, so ICLN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ICLN against PBW, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ICLN against PBW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/icln-vs-pbw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources