Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

CNRG vs ICLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CNRG returned −14.9% to ICLN's −2.3%; 22% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CNRG and ICLN

Net assets: $167m on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF, and $2.1bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Global Clean Energy ETF.

At a glance
27.8%
CNRG in the S&P 500
8.8%
ICLN in the S&P 500
−14.9%
CNRG total return, 1 year
−2.3%
ICLN total return, 1 year
CNRG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 72% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
72% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of CNRG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.28%72%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 97% · top ten 37% of the fund · 38 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 7% in72% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of CNRG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.28%72%inoutside the S&P 500active share 97% · Nasdaq-100: 7% in

28% of CNRG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

ICLN · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 91% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of ICLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.9%91%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 52% of the fund · 106 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in91% of its weight is outside the S&P 5009% of ICLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.9%91%9% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

9% of ICLN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 91% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ICLN costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.6 points; ICLN is 12.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CNRG vs ICLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureCNRGICLN
Return
Total return, 1 year−14.9%−2.3%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high40.7%, high on Feb 9, 202154.7%, high on Jun 25, 2008
Against its benchmark
What it tracksClean energyClean energy
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 29.7 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 29.7 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.45%0.38%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$167m$2.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common22%

Method

Risk and return

Nov 2, 2018 to Oct 30, 2026 · 417 weekly returns
CNRG ICLN
Return
Total return edge CNRG +199.1% +103.9%
Annualized edge CNRG +14.6% +9.3%
Price return edge CNRG +169.1% +83.6%
Risk
Volatility edge ICLN 35.2% 30.1%
Max drawdown edge ICLN (slight) −66.2% −64.8%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CNRG 0.48 0.35
Sortino edge CNRG 0.74 0.52
Calmar edge CNRG 0.22 0.14
Reading

From Nov 2018 to Oct 2026, CNRG returned more: +199.1% to +103.9%. ICLN swung less: 30.1% to 35.2%. ICLN fell slightly less at its worst: −64.8% to −66.2%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CNRG vs ICLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureCNRGICLNEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+199.1%+103.9%CNRGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.6%+9.3%CNRGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+169.1%+83.6%CNRGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility35.2%30.1%ICLNSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation23.1%20.5%ICLNLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−66.2%−64.8%ICLN (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.480.35CNRGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.740.52CNRGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.220.14CNRGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 417 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

22%

By the books each fund has filed, CNRG and ICLN hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

22% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CNRG ICLN
BLOOM ENERGY CORP A 3.52% 6.23%
NEXTPOWER INC 3.31% 9.29%
FIRST SOLAR INC 2.88% 8.75%
ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.66% 3.08%
ENPHASE ENERGY INC 2.32% 2.85%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD 2.78% 1.96%
SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.33% 1.44%
PLUG POWER INC 1.90% 1.40%
SHOALS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP A 3.53% 1.01%
ARRAY TECHNOLOGIES INC 2.62% 0.51%
T1 ENERGY INC 1.41% 0.44%
RENEW ENERGY GLOBAL PLC A 1.95% 0.35%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CNRG
CONSTELLATION ENERGY 4.20%
TRANSALTA CORP 4.12%
GE VERNOVA INC 4.08%
AES CORP 3.93%
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 3.82%
AVISTA CORP 3.47%
GENERAC HOLDINGS INC 3.38%
CIA ENERGETICA DE SPON ADR 3.37%
Only in ICLN
IBERDROLA 6.71%
CHINA YANGTZE POWER LTD A 5.59%
AXIA ENERGIA SA 3.84%
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS 3.32%
CHUBU ELECTRIC POWER INC 2.70%
EDP ENERGIAS DE PORTUGAL 2.26%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC CLASS C 2.21%
EQUATORIAL SA 1.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: CNRG vs ICLN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowCNRGICLNCNRGICLN
3 months−13.7%−8.3%−13.6 pts vs VOOnot measured
6 months−24.1%−21.9%−29.1 pts vs VOOnot measured
1 year−14.9%−2.3%−29.7 pts vs VOOnot measured
3 years+31.6%+27.1%−51.7 pts vs VOOnot measured
Since launchNot the same days: CNRG Oct 2018 · ICLN Jun 2008+204.0%−54.7%−13.5 pts vs VOOnot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CNRG State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF · Holds 38 stocks in clean energy, 28% of its weight in S&P 500 companies ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF · Holds 106 stocks in clean energy, 9% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Clean energy Clean energy
In the S&P 500 27.8% 8.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 96.9% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 7.4% 0.0%
Holdings 38 106
Top ten, share of the fund 37.4% 52.4%
Expense ratio 0.45% 0.38%
Fee for the differing part 0.46% 0.38%
Total return, 1 year −14.9% −2.3%
vs its benchmark −29.7 pts vs VOO not measured
Below its high −40.7% −54.7%
Net assets, CNRG as of Nov 3, 2026 and ICLN as of Nov 4, 2026 $167m $2.1bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

22% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

CNRG and ICLN flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CNRG

By weight, 28% of CNRG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 38 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −14.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 29.7 pts. It sits 40.7% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.

ICLN

By weight, 9% of ICLN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 106 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −2.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 54.7% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2008.

Questions people ask

Do CNRG and ICLN hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CNRG or ICLN?
CNRG has 28% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ICLN has 9%, so ICLN differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CNRG or ICLN?
CNRG charges 0.45% a year and ICLN charges 0.38%, so ICLN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CNRG against ICLN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cnrg-vs-icln

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.