Do IBLC and SATO hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, IBLC or SATO?

IBLC has 36% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SATO has 10%, so SATO differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, IBLC or SATO?

IBLC charges 0.47% a year and SATO charges 0.66%, so IBLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

IBLC vs SATO: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IBLC returned −36.4% to SATO's −39.7%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IBLC and SATO

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $66m for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF and $6.5m for Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF.

IBLC on its own →SATO on its own →

At a glance

35.8%

IBLC in the S&P 500

10.0%

SATO in the S&P 500

−36.4%

IBLC total return, 1 year

−39.7%

SATO total return, 1 year

IBLC · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 64% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

36% of IBLC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

SATO · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 90% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

10% of SATO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 90% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IBLC costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; IBLC is 10.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IBLC vs SATO: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	IBLC	SATO
Return
Measure	IBLC	SATO
Total return, 1 year	−36.4%	−39.7%
Drawdown
Measure	IBLC	SATO
Below its all-time high	43.3%, high on Oct 15, 2025	49.8%, high on Oct 6, 2025
Against its benchmark
Measure	IBLC	SATO
What it tracks	Blockchain and crypto equities	Blockchain and crypto equities
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 54.7 pts
Cost and size
Measure	IBLC	SATO
Expense ratio	0.47%	0.66%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$66m	$6.5m
Active share vs the S&P 500	92%	94%
Holdings
Measure	IBLC	SATO
Holdings in common	25%

Method

What they share

25%

By the books each fund has filed, IBLC and SATO hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IBLC SATO

CIRCLE INTERNET GROUP INC CLASS A 11.53% 2.06%

COINBASE GLOBAL CLASS A 12.49% 1.87%

GALAXY DIGITAL INC CLASS A 2.56% 1.85%

RIOT PLATFORMS 3.91% 1.84%

HUT CORP 5.69% 1.77%

CLEANSPARK 1.61% 1.69%

MARA HOLDINGS 2.17% 1.60%

IREN 6.68% 1.51%

CIPHER DIGITAL INC 2.22% 1.33%

PAYPAL HOLDINGS 1.04% 0.98%

ETORO GROUP CLASS A 0.91% 1.98%

CORE SCIENTIFIC INC 3.50% 0.86%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in IBLC

MASTERCARD CLASS A 5.91%

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CO 4.92%

TENCENT HOLDINGS 4.74%

IONIC DIGITAL INC CLASS A 2.20%

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 1.60%

PING AN INSURANCE (GROUP) OF CHINA 1.50%

KEEL INFRASTRUCTURE CORP 1.08%

SECURITIZE CORP 0.87%

Only in SATO

POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 17.34%

Metaplanet Inc 2.12%

Cypherpunk Technologies Inc 2.04%

Hyperion DeFi Inc 2.00%

Hyperliquid Strategies Inc 1.99%

Strategy Inc 1.98%

Twenty One Capital Inc 1.93%

Forward Industries Inc 1.89%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: IBLC vs SATO: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	IBLC	SATO	IBLC	SATO
3 months	−19.3%	−7.9%	not measured	−6.6 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−33.6%	−26.0%	not measured	−28.6 pts vs ACWI
1 year	−36.4%	−39.7%	not measured	−54.7 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+117.6%	+118.3%	not measured	+40.7 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: IBLC Apr 2022 · SATO Oct 2021	+65.4%	−21.7%	not measured	−92.0 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF · Holds 42 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 36% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SATO Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF · Holds 62 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 10% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer iShares Invesco

Theme Blockchain and crypto equities Blockchain and crypto equities

In the S&P 500 35.8% 10.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 92.5% 94.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 11.1% 6.4%

Holdings 42 62

Top ten, share of the fund 66.0% 35.6%

Expense ratio 0.47% 0.66%

Fee for the differing part 0.51% 0.70%

Total return, 1 year −36.4% −39.7%

vs its benchmark not measured −54.7 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −43.3% −49.8%

Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $66m $6.5m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

25% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

IBLC

By weight, 36% of IBLC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 42 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −36.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 43.3% below its all-time high of Oct 15, 2025.

SATO

By weight, 10% of SATO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 94%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 62 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −39.7% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 54.7 pts. It sits 49.8% below its all-time high of Oct 6, 2025.

Questions people ask

Do IBLC and SATO hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IBLC or SATO?: IBLC has 36% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SATO has 10%, so SATO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IBLC or SATO?: IBLC charges 0.47% a year and SATO charges 0.66%, so IBLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

IBLC vs OWNB IBLC vs BLCK IBLC vs BKCH IBLC vs STCE SATO vs BCDF SATO vs BLOK SATO vs BCOR SATO vs BLCK

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →IBLC on its own →SATO on its own →IBLC dividend history →IBLC holdings →SATO dividend history →SATO holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

IBLC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IBLC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IBLC ↗

SATO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SATO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Invesco page for SATO ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IBLC against SATO, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/iblc-vs-sato

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.