Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BLCK vs IBLC: which is really different?

BLCK and IBLC hold 52% of their weight in the same names.

Corgi Crypto Infrastructure ETF and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF.

23.3%BLCK in the S&P 500
35.2%IBLC in the S&P 500
−9.7%BLCK total return, 1 year
−3.5%IBLC total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Off-Index Score: BLCK scores higher

How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

BLCK 69.3IBLC 28.50.1, the lowest in this set91.8, the highest

A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BLCK77% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 3 months to Sep 18, 2026
23%77%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 51% of the fund · 34 holdings filed Sep 18, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 3% in23%77%inoutside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 51% of the fund
IBLC65% of its weight is outside the S&P 500 · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
35%65%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 93% · top ten 66% of the fund · 50 holdings filed Sep 17, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 10% in35%65%inoutside the S&P 500active share 93% · top ten 66% of the fund

52% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BLCK and IBLC hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BLCK and IBLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBLCKIBLC
Coinbase Global Inc7.88%12.29%
Circle Internet Group Inc5.94%10.36%
HUT 8 CORP4.93%6.49%
Riot Platforms Inc4.74%4.88%
IREN Ltd4.44%9.39%
Cipher Digital Inc3.95%3.69%
Terawulf Inc3.25%3.51%
MARA Holdings Inc3.80%2.95%
Galaxy Digital Inc3.27%2.76%
Cleanspark Inc3.41%2.11%
Robinhood Markets Inc4.96%1.40%
Bitdeer Technologies Group2.86%1.11%
Only in each
Only in BLCKOnly in IBLC
BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc 5.58%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.56%
CME Group Inc 4.74%MASTERCARD CLASS A 3.80%
Figure Technology Solutions Inc 4.21%NVIDIA 3.76%
GPGI Inc 2.48%TENCENT HOLDINGS 3.68%
Bit Digital Inc 2.18%INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 3.33%
CoinShares PLC 1.98%IONIC DIGITAL INC CLASS A 2.02%
Block Inc 1.85%KEEL INFRASTRUCTURE CORP 1.46%
Coincheck Group NV 1.63%INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 1.29%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BLCK and IBLC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
BLCKIBLCBLCKIBLCBLCKIBLC
3 months−6.1%−7.8%−8.3 pts−10.0 pts−3.6 pts−5.3 pts
6 monthsnot published+23.1%not published+5.1 ptsnot published−1.1 pts
1 yearnot published−3.5%not published−20.1 ptsnot published−25.3 pts
3 yearsnot published+212.2%not published+133.8 ptsnot published+114.0 pts
Since launch−9.7%+131.6%−14.0 pts+37.7 pts−13.5 pts−2.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BLCK and IBLC on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BLCK
Corgi Crypto Infrastructure ETF
Holds 34 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 23% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
Holds 50 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 35% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IssuerCorgiiShares
ThemeBlockchain and crypto equitiesBlockchain and crypto equities
In the S&P 50023.3%35.2%
Active share vs the S&P 50099.5%92.7%
In the Nasdaq-1002.6%10.2%
Holdings3450
Top ten, share of the fund51.4%65.9%
Expense ratio0.35%0.47%
Fee for the differing part0.35%0.51%
Total return, 1 year−9.7% (since launch on May 6, 2026)−3.5%
vs the S&P 500−14.0 pts−20.1 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100−13.5 pts−25.3 pts
Below its high−10.4%−20.7%
Net assets$512,649$89m

BLCK in plain words

By weight, 23% of BLCK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 51% of the fund across 34 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Since it launched on May 6, 2026 the fund returned −9.7% with distributions reinvested against +4.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. It sits 10.4% below its all-time high of May 14, 2026.

IBLC in plain words

By weight, 35% of IBLC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 93%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 50 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −3.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 20.1 pts. It sits 20.7% below its all-time high of Oct 15, 2025.

Questions people ask

Do BLCK and IBLC hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 52% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is close to holding one of them twice. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BLCK or IBLC?
BLCK has 23% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IBLC has 35%, so BLCK differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BLCK or IBLC?
BLCK charges 0.35% a year and IBLC charges 0.47%, so BLCK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BLCK against IBLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BLCK against IBLC, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/blck-vs-iblc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources