Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BCDF vs BLCK: Holdings Overlap & Returns
BCDF and BLCK hold 8% of their weight in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BCDF and BLCK
Net assets: $22m on Jun 30, 2026 for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF, and $356,612 on Nov 4, 2026 for Corgi Crypto Infrastructure ETF.
18% of BCDF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
31% of BLCK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
BLCK costs 0.50 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BCDF | BLCK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.8% | not published |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 37.6%, high on May 14, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Blockchain and crypto equities | Blockchain and crypto equities |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +11.4% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 1.4 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, BCDF as of Jun 30, 2026 and BLCK as of Nov 4, 2026 | $22m | $356,612 |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 8% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BCDF and BLCK hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
8% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BCDF | BLCK | BCDF | BLCK |
| 3 months | +4.5% | −20.6% | +6.7 pts vs ONEQ | not measured |
| 6 months | +2.8% | −37.1% | +2.6 pts vs ONEQ | not measured |
| 1 year | +12.8% | – | +1.4 pts vs ONEQ | – |
| 3 years | +64.6% | – | −30.6 pts vs ONEQ | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: BCDF Aug 2022 · BLCK May 2026 | +38.8% | −37.1% | −78.2 pts vs ONEQ | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
8% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BCDF
By weight, 18% of BCDF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested against +11.4% for its benchmark, the NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts.
BLCK
By weight, 31% of BLCK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 33 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on May 6, 2026 the fund returned −37.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 37.6% below its all-time high of May 14, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BCDF and BLCK hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BCDF against BLCK, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-blck
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BCDF against BLCK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-blck
[BCDF against BLCK (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-blck)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.