Data as of .
BCDF vs OWNB: which is really different?
BCDF and OWNB hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and BCDF returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: BCDF scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
7% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BCDF and OWNB hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | BCDF | OWNB |
|---|---|---|
| Galaxy Digital Inc | 4.38% | 1.77% |
| Only in BCDF | Only in OWNB |
|---|---|
| Singapore Exchange Ltd 8.77% | STRATEGY INC 15.79% |
| Urbana Corp 7.73% | MARA HOLDINGS INC 9.16% |
| Cboe Global Markets Inc 7.18% | TWENTY ONE CAPITAL INC 6.41% |
| TMX Group Ltd 5.67% | METAPLANET INC 5.88% |
| Deutsche Boerse AG 5.25% | RIOT PLATFORMS INC 5.49% |
| Nasdaq Inc 4.94% | HUT 8 CORP 5.02% |
| Japan Exchange Group Inc 4.89% | REMIXPOINT INC 4.94% |
| CACI International Inc 4.72% | CLEANSPARK INC 4.62% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCDF | OWNB | BCDF | OWNB | BCDF | OWNB | |
| 3 months | +7.0% | +12.4% | +4.8 pts | +10.2 pts | +9.5 pts | +14.9 pts |
| 6 months | +6.5% | +33.2% | −11.6 pts | +15.2 pts | −17.8 pts | +9.0 pts |
| 1 year | +7.5% | −35.2% | −9.1 pts | −51.8 pts | −14.3 pts | −57.0 pts |
| 3 years | +59.5% | not published | −18.9 pts | not published | −38.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +33.8% | +2.1% | −63.7 pts | −37.6 pts | −101.4 pts | −52.0 pts |
| BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF Holds 35 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 20% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF Holds 26 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Horizon Kinetics | Bitwise |
| Theme | Blockchain and crypto equities | Blockchain and crypto equities |
| In the S&P 500 | 20.1% | 5.2% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.6% | 98.1% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 17.6% |
| Holdings | 35 | 26 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 58.3% | 66.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.85% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.85% | 0.87% |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.5% | −35.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −9.1 pts | −51.8 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −14.3 pts | −57.0 pts |
| Below its high | −5.1% | −40.4% |
| Net assets | $22m | $19m |
BCDF in plain words
By weight, 20% of BCDF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +7.5% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts. It sits 5.1% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
OWNB in plain words
By weight, 5% of OWNB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 26 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned −35.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 51.8 pts. It sits 40.4% below its all-time high of Oct 15, 2025.
Questions people ask
- Do BCDF and OWNB hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, BCDF or OWNB?
- BCDF has 20% of its weight in S&P 500 names and OWNB has 5%, so BCDF differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, BCDF or OWNB?
- BCDF charges 0.85% a year and OWNB charges 0.85%, so BCDF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BCDF against OWNB, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-ownb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.