Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BCDF vs IBLC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BCDF returned +12.8% to IBLC's −36.4%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BCDF and IBLC
Net assets: $22m on Jun 30, 2026 for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF, and $66m on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF.
18% of BCDF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
36% of IBLC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
IBLC costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 49.2 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BCDF | IBLC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.8% | −36.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 43.3%, high on Oct 15, 2025 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Blockchain and crypto equities | Blockchain and crypto equities |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +11.4% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 1.4 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, BCDF as of Jun 30, 2026 and IBLC as of Nov 3, 2026 | $22m | $66m |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100% | 92% |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 3% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BCDF and IBLC hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
3% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BCDF | IBLC | BCDF | IBLC |
| 3 months | +4.5% | −19.3% | +6.7 pts vs ONEQ | not measured |
| 6 months | +2.8% | −33.6% | +2.6 pts vs ONEQ | not measured |
| 1 year | +12.8% | −36.4% | +1.4 pts vs ONEQ | not measured |
| 3 years | +64.6% | +117.6% | −30.6 pts vs ONEQ | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: BCDF Aug 2022 · IBLC Apr 2022 | +38.8% | +65.4% | −78.2 pts vs ONEQ | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
3% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BCDF
By weight, 18% of BCDF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested against +11.4% for its benchmark, the NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts.
IBLC
By weight, 36% of IBLC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 42 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −36.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 43.3% below its all-time high of Oct 15, 2025.
Questions people ask
- Do BCDF and IBLC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BCDF against IBLC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-iblc
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BCDF against IBLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-iblc
[BCDF against IBLC (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-iblc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.