Do IBLC and STCE hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, IBLC or STCE?

IBLC has 36% of its weight in S&P 500 names and STCE has 13%, so STCE differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, IBLC or STCE?

IBLC charges 0.47% a year and STCE charges 0.30%, so STCE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

IBLC vs STCE: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IBLC returned −36.4% to STCE's −47.2%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IBLC and STCE

Net assets: $66m on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF, and $270m on Jun 30, 2026 for Schwab Crypto Thematic Natural Language Processing ETF.

IBLC on its own →STCE on its own →

At a glance

35.8%

IBLC in the S&P 500

12.7%

STCE in the S&P 500

−36.4%

IBLC total return, 1 year

−47.2%

STCE total return, 1 year

IBLC · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 64% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

36% of IBLC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

STCE · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 87% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

13% of STCE's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

STCE costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IBLC vs STCE: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	IBLC	STCE
Return
Measure	IBLC	STCE
Total return, 1 year	−36.4%	−47.2%
Drawdown
Measure	IBLC	STCE
Below its all-time high	43.3%, high on Oct 15, 2025	56.1%, high on Oct 15, 2025
Against its benchmark
Measure	IBLC	STCE
What it tracks	Blockchain and crypto equities	Blockchain and crypto equities
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 62.2 pts
Cost and size
Measure	IBLC	STCE
Expense ratio	0.47%	0.30%
Net assets, IBLC as of Nov 3, 2026 and STCE as of Jun 30, 2026	$66m	$270m
Active share vs the S&P 500	92%	100%
Holdings
Measure	IBLC	STCE
Holdings in common	30%

Method

What they share

30%

By the books each fund has filed, IBLC and STCE hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

30% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IBLC STCE

IREN 6.68% 4.74%

RIOT PLATFORMS 3.91% 4.61%

CORE SCIENTIFIC INC 3.50% 5.70%

COINBASE GLOBAL CLASS A 12.49% 3.10%

GALAXY DIGITAL INC CLASS A 2.56% 5.68%

CIPHER DIGITAL INC 2.22% 3.55%

MARA HOLDINGS 2.17% 4.70%

CLEANSPARK 1.61% 5.22%

APPLIED DIGITAL 3.76% 1.54%

ROBINHOOD MARKETS CLASS A 1.36% 3.08%

PAYPAL HOLDINGS 1.04% 1.20%

BITDEER TECHNOLOGIES GROUP CLASS A 0.81% 8.22%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in IBLC

CIRCLE INTERNET GROUP INC CLASS A 11.53%

MASTERCARD CLASS A 5.91%

HUT CORP 5.69%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.35%

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CO 4.92%

NVIDIA 4.74%

TENCENT HOLDINGS 4.74%

TERAWULF 3.51%

Only in STCE

Hut 8 Corp 5.20%

Trump Media & Technology Group Corp 4.05%

Bit Digital Inc 3.67%

BitMine Immersion Technologies Inc 2.78%

Interactive Brokers Group Inc 2.74%

Block Inc 2.60%

Strategy Inc 1.96%

Monex Group Inc 1.71%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: IBLC vs STCE: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	IBLC	STCE	IBLC	STCE
3 months	−19.3%	−26.1%	not measured	−24.8 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−33.6%	−38.7%	not measured	−41.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year	−36.4%	−47.2%	not measured	−62.2 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+117.6%	+122.1%	not measured	+44.5 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: IBLC Apr 2022 · STCE Aug 2022	+65.4%	+92.0%	not measured	+3.9 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF · Holds 42 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 36% of its weight in S&P 500 companies STCE Schwab Crypto Thematic Natural Language Processing ETF · Holds 35 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 13% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer iShares Schwab

Theme Blockchain and crypto equities Blockchain and crypto equities

In the S&P 500 35.8% 12.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 92.5% 99.6%

In the Nasdaq-100 11.1% 3.2%

Holdings 42 35

Top ten, share of the fund 66.0% 53.9%

Expense ratio 0.47% 0.30%

Fee for the differing part 0.51% 0.30%

Total return, 1 year −36.4% −47.2%

vs its benchmark not measured −62.2 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −43.3% −56.1%

Net assets, IBLC as of Nov 3, 2026 and STCE as of Jun 30, 2026 $66m $270m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

30% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

IBLC

By weight, 36% of IBLC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 42 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −36.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 43.3% below its all-time high of Oct 15, 2025.

STCE

By weight, 13% of STCE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −47.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 62.2 pts. It sits 56.1% below its all-time high of Oct 15, 2025.

Questions people ask

Do IBLC and STCE hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 30% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IBLC or STCE?: IBLC has 36% of its weight in S&P 500 names and STCE has 13%, so STCE differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IBLC or STCE?: IBLC charges 0.47% a year and STCE charges 0.30%, so STCE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

IBLC vs BKCH IBLC vs WGMI IBLC vs BITQ IBLC vs CRPT STCE vs BCDF STCE vs OWNB STCE vs BLOK STCE vs BCOR

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →IBLC on its own →STCE on its own →IBLC dividend history →IBLC holdings →STCE dividend history →STCE holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

IBLC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IBLC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IBLC ↗

STCE filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

STCE prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Schwab website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IBLC against STCE, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/iblc-vs-stce

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.