Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BCDF vs STCE: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BCDF returned +12.8% to STCE's −47.2%; 6% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BCDF and STCE
Net assets on Jun 30, 2026: $22m for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF and $270m for Schwab Crypto Thematic Natural Language Processing ETF.
18% of BCDF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
13% of STCE's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
Pair scorecard
STCE costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 60.0 points; STCE is 12.3 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BCDF | STCE |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.8% | −47.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 56.1%, high on Oct 15, 2025 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Blockchain and crypto equities | Blockchain and crypto equities |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +11.4% | +15.0% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 1.4 pts | behind by 62.2 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $22m | $270m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 6% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BCDF and STCE hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
6% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BCDF | STCE | BCDF | STCE |
| 3 months | +4.5% | −26.1% | +6.7 pts vs ONEQ | −24.8 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | +2.8% | −38.7% | +2.6 pts vs ONEQ | −41.3 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +12.8% | −47.2% | +1.4 pts vs ONEQ | −62.2 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +64.6% | +122.1% | −30.6 pts vs ONEQ | +44.5 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: BCDF Aug 2022 · STCE Aug 2022 | +38.8% | +92.0% | −78.2 pts vs ONEQ | +3.9 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
6% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BCDF
By weight, 18% of BCDF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested against +11.4% for its benchmark, the NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts.
STCE
By weight, 13% of STCE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −47.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 62.2 pts. It sits 56.1% below its all-time high of Oct 15, 2025.
Questions people ask
- Do BCDF and STCE hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BCDF against STCE, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-stce
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BCDF against STCE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-stce
[BCDF against STCE (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-stce)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.