Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BCDF vs BLOK: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BCDF returned +12.8% to BLOK's −22.4%; 8% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BCDF and BLOKNet assets: $22m on Jun 30, 2026 for Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF, and $888m on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF.
18% of BCDF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
31% of BLOK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
BLOK costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 35.2 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BCDF | BLOK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.8% | −22.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 29.8%, high on Oct 9, 2025 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Blockchain and crypto equities | Blockchain and crypto equities |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +11.4% | +15.0% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 1.4 pts | behind by 37.4 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.70% |
| Net assets, BCDF as of Jun 30, 2026 and BLOK as of Nov 3, 2026 | $22m | $888m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 8% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BCDF and BLOK hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
8% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BCDF | BLOK | BCDF | BLOK |
| 3 months | +4.5% | −14.7% | +6.7 pts vs ONEQ | −13.4 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | +2.8% | −21.7% | +2.6 pts vs ONEQ | −24.3 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +12.8% | −22.4% | +1.4 pts vs ONEQ | −37.4 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +64.6% | +152.1% | −30.6 pts vs ONEQ | +74.5 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: BCDF Aug 2022 · BLOK Jan 2018 | +38.8% | +231.5% | −78.2 pts vs ONEQ | +86.9 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
8% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BCDF
By weight, 18% of BCDF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +12.8% with distributions reinvested against +11.4% for its benchmark, the NASDAQ Composite Total Return Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts.
BLOK
By weight, 31% of BLOK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −22.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Net Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 37.4 pts. It sits 29.8% below its all-time high of Oct 9, 2025.
Questions people ask
- Do BCDF and BLOK hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BCDF against BLOK, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-blok
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BCDF against BLOK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-blok
[BCDF against BLOK (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bcdf-vs-blok)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.