Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BLOK vs IBLC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BLOK returned −22.4% to IBLC's −36.4%; 37% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BLOK and IBLC
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $888m for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF and $66m for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF.
31% of BLOK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
36% of IBLC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
IBLC costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.0 points; BLOK is 13.5 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BLOK | IBLC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −22.4% | −36.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 29.8%, high on Oct 9, 2025 | 43.3%, high on Oct 15, 2025 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Blockchain and crypto equities | Blockchain and crypto equities |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 37.4 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.70% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $888m | $66m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 37% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BLOK and IBLC hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
37% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BLOK | IBLC | BLOK | IBLC |
| 3 months | −14.7% | −19.3% | −13.4 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 6 months | −21.7% | −33.6% | −24.3 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 1 year | −22.4% | −36.4% | −37.4 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| 3 years | +152.1% | +117.6% | +74.5 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: BLOK Jan 2018 · IBLC Apr 2022 | +231.5% | +65.4% | +86.9 pts vs ACWI | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
37% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BLOK
By weight, 31% of BLOK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −22.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Net Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 37.4 pts. It sits 29.8% below its all-time high of Oct 9, 2025.
IBLC
By weight, 36% of IBLC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 42 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −36.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 43.3% below its all-time high of Oct 15, 2025.
Questions people ask
- Do BLOK and IBLC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 37% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BLOK against IBLC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/blok-vs-iblc
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BLOK against IBLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/blok-vs-iblc
[BLOK against IBLC (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/blok-vs-iblc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.