Do CRPT and IBLC hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CRPT or IBLC?

CRPT has 20% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IBLC has 36%, so CRPT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CRPT or IBLC?

CRPT charges 0.85% a year and IBLC charges 0.47%, so IBLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

CRPT vs IBLC: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CRPT returned −33.2% to IBLC's −36.4%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CRPT and IBLC

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $96m for First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry and Digital Economy ETF and $66m for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF.

CRPT on its own →IBLC on its own →

At a glance

19.7%

CRPT in the S&P 500

35.8%

IBLC in the S&P 500

−33.2%

CRPT total return, 1 year

−36.4%

IBLC total return, 1 year

CRPT · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 80% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

20% of CRPT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 80% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

IBLC · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 64% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

36% of IBLC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IBLC costs 0.38 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.2 points; CRPT is 1.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

CRPT vs IBLC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CRPT	IBLC
Return
Measure	CRPT	IBLC
Total return, 1 year	−33.2%	−36.4%
Drawdown
Measure	CRPT	IBLC
Below its all-time high	49.2%, high on Nov 9, 2021	43.3%, high on Oct 15, 2025
Against its benchmark
Measure	CRPT	IBLC
What it tracks	Blockchain and crypto equities	Blockchain and crypto equities
Against the S&P 500, 1 year	behind by 48.0 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+14.8%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	behind by 48.0 pts
Cost and size
Measure	CRPT	IBLC
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.47%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$96m	$66m
Active share vs the S&P 500	100%	92%
Holdings
Measure	CRPT	IBLC
Holdings in common	21%

Method

What they share

21%

By the books each fund has filed, CRPT and IBLC hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

21% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CRPT IBLC

Coinbase Global, Inc. (Class A) 12.15% 12.49%

Galaxy Digital Inc. (Class A) 10.80% 2.56%

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (Class A) 7.56% 1.36%

TeraWulf Inc. 0.77% 3.51%

Riot Platforms, Inc. 0.65% 3.91%

IREN Ltd. 0.59% 6.68%

Circle Internet Group, Inc. (Class A) 0.58% 11.53%

CleanSpark, Inc. 0.55% 1.61%

Cipher Digital Inc. 0.53% 2.22%

MARA Holdings, Inc. 0.40% 2.17%

Bitdeer Technologies Group (Class A) 0.35% 0.81%

HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. 0.32% 0.39%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in CRPT

Strategy Incorporated (Class A) 24.72%

Metaplanet Inc. 10.55%

iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 5.47%

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund 5.08%

Strive, Inc. (Class A) 4.72%

VanEck Bitcoin ETF 4.64%

Bitwise Bitcoin ETF 4.62%

Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF 4.62%

Only in IBLC

MASTERCARD CLASS A 5.91%

HUT CORP 5.69%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 5.35%

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CO 4.92%

NVIDIA 4.74%

TENCENT HOLDINGS 4.74%

APPLIED DIGITAL 3.76%

CORE SCIENTIFIC INC 3.50%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: CRPT vs IBLC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	CRPT	IBLC	CRPT	IBLC
3 months	+15.9%	−19.3%	+16.0 pts vs VOO	not measured
6 months	−16.4%	−33.6%	−21.4 pts vs VOO	not measured
1 year	−33.2%	−36.4%	−48.0 pts vs VOO	not measured
3 years	+120.3%	+117.6%	+37.0 pts vs VOO	not measured
Since launchNot the same days: CRPT Sep 2021 · IBLC Apr 2022	−28.1%	+65.4%	−117.7 pts vs VOO	not measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CRPT First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry and Digital Economy ETF · Holds 20 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 20% of its weight in S&P 500 companies IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF · Holds 42 stocks in blockchain and crypto equities, 36% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer First Trust iShares

Theme Blockchain and crypto equities Blockchain and crypto equities

In the S&P 500 19.7% 35.8%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.8% 92.5%

In the Nasdaq-100 24.7% 11.1%

Holdings 20 42

Top ten, share of the fund 90.3% 66.0%

Expense ratio 0.85% 0.47%

Fee for the differing part 0.85% 0.51%

Total return, 1 year −33.2% −36.4%

vs its benchmark −48.0 pts vs VOO not measured

Below its high −49.2% −43.3%

Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $96m $66m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

21% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

CRPT

By weight, 20% of CRPT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 90% of the fund across 20 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −33.2% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 48.0 pts. It sits 49.2% below its all-time high of Nov 9, 2021.

IBLC

By weight, 36% of IBLC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 66% of the fund across 42 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −36.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 43.3% below its all-time high of Oct 15, 2025.

Questions people ask

Do CRPT and IBLC hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CRPT or IBLC?: CRPT has 20% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IBLC has 36%, so CRPT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CRPT or IBLC?: CRPT charges 0.85% a year and IBLC charges 0.47%, so IBLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CRPT vs BCDF CRPT vs DAPP CRPT vs FDIG CRPT vs OWNB IBLC vs BCOR IBLC vs STCE IBLC vs BITQ IBLC vs BCDF

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CRPT on its own →IBLC on its own →CRPT dividend history →CRPT holdings →IBLC dividend history →IBLC holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CRPT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CRPT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

First Trust page for CRPT ↗

IBLC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IBLC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IBLC ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CRPT against IBLC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/crpt-vs-iblc

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.