Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GNR vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GNR returned +32.9% to URA's −31.0%; 1% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GNR and URA
Net assets: $5.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF, and $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF.
26% of GNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
GNR costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 63.9 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GNR | URA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +32.9% | −31.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 6.8%, high on Sep 9, 2026 | 62.8%, high on Feb 2, 2011 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Natural resources | Nuclear and uranium |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 46.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.69% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $5.2bn | $5.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36% | 63% |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GNR and URA hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
1% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GNR | URA | GNR | URA |
| 3 months | +1.4% | −23.8% | not measured | −22.5 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | +0.4% | −43.9% | not measured | −46.5 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +32.9% | −31.0% | not measured | −46.0 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +50.3% | +38.6% | not measured | −39.0 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: GNR Sep 2010 · URA Nov 2010 | +138.2% | −50.9% | not measured | −421.0 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
GNR
By weight, 26% of GNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 104 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +32.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.
URA
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 46.0 pts. It sits 62.8% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Do GNR and URA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GNR against URA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gnr-vs-ura
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GNR against URA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gnr-vs-ura
[GNR against URA (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gnr-vs-ura)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.